PAC-Floyd common opponents, who's doing a better job?

He did better in dodging them.

 

Yeah you got it. :good Floyd did a better job ducking Cotto and Margarito.

 

what people r failing to realize is that pac faced faded versions of them. they were floyds left overs. of course u r gonna look better against someone who is older now. bunch of arse kissers on here. pathetic

 

**** off. I chose Floyd as the better man who fought shane. What are you? a ******* in disguise?

 

So.....you mean to tell me that ONLY PAC faced "faded versions" of fighters that Floyd beat even though those same fighters had already been defeated even before Floyd beat them? AHAHA! you have a very interesting thought process kid. Logic is something you seem to struggle with. How is it that Floyd didn't even inflict the kind of punishment that is considered "career ending" yet you somehow find a way to dismiss all logic and claim "Floyd" caused their digression as fighters? Conveniently ..... It's because Pac dominated those same guys even better.

 

:rofl WTF...... Again...... Using your cluster **** logic it only exposes how desperate you are to defend Floyd at all costs... Even if it means making you looked like a massive ******. FLOYD BEAT OLDER FIGHTERS WHO HAVE ALREADY BEEN DEFEATED you simple ****. So I guess it was a lot easier for Floyd to b:-(eat "older" fighters.

 

How they fair vs common opponents has no bearing on what would happen in a fight between the two. They are two different fighters with totally different styles.

 

This sounds really dumb. what does older fighters have to do with Floyd fighting most of those guys before pac??

Even though I dont REALLY agree with the he fought them first line of thinking, your response is horrible and just plain dumb.

 

Dude....if you followed the convo you'd understand. Im not pressed to explain. You seem bright enough to be able to follow the conversation if its that serious to you.

 

Pac's win against JMM is about the same as for Floyd's win against ODLH.

Same as Floyd vs JMM = Pac vs ODLH. They both fought the weaker versions of these guys.

Pac (1) - Floyd (1)

For Mosley, both fights were boring but both did a great job against Mosley. This is debatable. Pac scored a knocked down. Floyd fought a little bit better version since Mosley was coming of an impressive win against Margarito.

Now for Hatton, Floyd did beat him when he was undefeated and then Pac did beat him on Hatton's best weight class (where he was the man to beat).

The main factor will be the way Hatton was defeated. Pac's win was more impressive.

So, I voted Pac on this one.

 

that's pretty poor considering every pacturd has about 12 alt accounts

 

Is the question about who fought the better version?


I thought it is all about who did a better job, plain and simple!!!!!


*****s have alaways a way of twisting their logic!!!!!!! Just like how they can justify that Baldomir is the better opponent than Margarito at that time!!!! *****s are dumbest bunch of idiots ever.

 

Floyd cheated the scales vs JMM. It was over before it even started.

 

Hmmmnnn... You got a very valid point so it could be 4-0 for PAC.

 

agree with this