Jose Napoles vs. Alexis Arguello at 135

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by bodhi, Aug 29, 2011.


  1. itrymariti

    itrymariti Cañas! Full Member

    13,728
    47
    Sep 6, 2008
    So Arguello stands a better chance of beating Napoles than Sugar Ray Leonard?

    :lol: Get back in your cage.
     
  2. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล

    82,426
    1,478
    Sep 7, 2008
    :yep :deal

    October 1st I'm back in the 'Dam :happy
     
  3. El Bujia

    El Bujia Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,744
    81
    Apr 4, 2010
    The scorecards and the knockdown in Napoles' favour think differently from Eddie.

    Weed makes you an analysing machine. Everything seems so much clearer on it.

    As for the body work, not sure trading body blows with Arguello is a good idea for anybody. He was one of the very best of all time in that regard for my money.
     
  4. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace

    82,092
    22,235
    Sep 15, 2009
    Well the formula lost me my student house at uni because I bet the house on it so I won't elaborate the way it works in case people think, as I initially did, that it does actually work.

    The flaw was that the formula was self canibalising, that being that the odds of breaking even were, in the long term, less than the odds of losing everything you've won. Which is exactly what happened, because I didn't have the capital to win back the few k I lost I could never continue in the manner I intended so once the odds were that i'd lose that few k, I could never win it back. Which is exactly what happened.

    For a few months I felt like a king skipping lectures and taking 60-80 quid for an hours work but I felt sick when it all went tits up.

    Still I came out with a first class honours degree and today i'm a maths teacher so I guess everything worked out for the best :good
     
  5. GPater11093

    GPater11093 Barry Full Member

    38,034
    93
    Nov 10, 2008
    My birthday incidently.

    I'd never have thought that, shows what I know about drugs.

    I'm not talking about trading body blows, just Napoles could step in with them, just the way he throws them and the shape of Arguello's body, to me makes it seem like he couldnt miss.

    Its all about knowing when to stop.
     
  6. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace

    82,092
    22,235
    Sep 15, 2009
    And stop I have :)
     
  7. GPater11093

    GPater11093 Barry Full Member

    38,034
    93
    Nov 10, 2008
    Stopped after losing though.
     
  8. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace

    82,092
    22,235
    Sep 15, 2009
    Indeed.
     
  9. Duodenum

    Duodenum Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,632
    345
    Apr 18, 2007
    What makes you think I ever stepped outside my cage?

    Ray didn't have the power to take out Napoles if he couldn't hurt Duran. Boxing publications slated SRL the winner over Napoles on cuts during early 1980s fantasy bouts, but again, Ray never defeated an opponent this way. (In fact, the only time I recall him drawing any blood was with that early accidental butt on Benitez, a laceration he did not aggravate with his fists.) I did think at the time that Jose could have bested him.

    Napoles-SRL is going the distance, and Montreal showed Ray was not invincible against an ATG former LW at 147. Jose has at least half a dozen more inches of reach than El Cholo. Plus, he had the defensive skills to exploit SRL's telegraphing as Randy Shields, Benitez and Duran in Montreal did to him miss. Mantequilla's countering would make him pay for those misses.

    Here, it's not a matter of styles so much as specific strengths, flaws and weaknesses. Arguello had the razors in his fists Ray lacked. He was also an accurate sharpshooter, and a more noted body puncher. (There was absolutely nothing deficient with SRL's body attack, perhaps the key factor in his WW unification win over Hearns, but we see Arguello putting champions like Royal Kobayashi and Andy Ganigan down for the count with his gut shots.)
     
  10. PetethePrince

    PetethePrince Slick & Redheaded Full Member

    28,760
    86
    May 30, 2009
    :lol:

    Just the reply I expected.
     
  11. itrymariti

    itrymariti Cañas! Full Member

    13,728
    47
    Sep 6, 2008
    So Arguello was a better fighter than SRL, not only in P4P but in absolute terms?
     
  12. El Bujia

    El Bujia Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,744
    81
    Apr 4, 2010
    Leonard wouldn't need cuts to beat Napoles. He was just a bad matchup for him flat out. Bigger, longer, faster, and every bit as powerful. He'd beat Napoles to the punch more often than not, although Napoles would make a hell of a fight of it late. I'd wager Ray still beats him by a couple of points if he doesn't stop him on cuts earlier. A cuts stoppage is hardly out of the equation regardless of Ray's track record. It's not like the guys Napoles was cut by had a history of dicing people up.
     
  13. itrymariti

    itrymariti Cañas! Full Member

    13,728
    47
    Sep 6, 2008
    Well Napoles' style was hardly predicated on beating an opponent to the punch. In fact, he's probably the finest example of a fighter who does precisely the opposite.
     
  14. itrymariti

    itrymariti Cañas! Full Member

    13,728
    47
    Sep 6, 2008
    If anything, orthodox rounded boxers are his meat and drink. You saw what he did to Cokes.
     
  15. El Bujia

    El Bujia Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,744
    81
    Apr 4, 2010
    Perhaps not, but Leonard's style was, and I'm quite confident in Leonard's overall physical advantages (alongside his supreme technical skills) winning the day over Napoles.

    I don't see the relevance.