Only being able to fight outside is just as one dimensional as a guy who can only fight going forward. I haven't seen Pacquiao fight effectively in close. Or a lot of others on that list.
I think Hopkins, because look how many times he defied the odds and pulled a win out of his a$$. Seriously, for the people that voted for Floyd, when was the last time anyone REALLY thought Floyd was gonna lose to an upcoming opponent. When was the last time that Floyd came into a fight as the underdog? Now ask the same question for B-hop, I'm a fan but I know I feared for his safety on more than a few fights. Case in point, B-hop has dismantled ALMOST every fighter he has faced but more signifigant is that there aren't any blatant challenges that he has not stepped up to and /or conquered......even at 46, there will never be any "what ifs" in Hopkins career.
Floyd is the most versatile in the game. He is able to bang, he is able to move, and he can take a hit, even from the back
I guess consistently operating at world class level into your mid forties and still beating guys half your age and figuring out ways to dominate pavlik,tarver,de la hoya, trinidad, pascal etc. doesn't have anything remotely to do with being versatile. You should change your name to boxingchump.:hi: