*** British Class of 2008 - Discussion Thread ***

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by Beeston Brawler, Sep 5, 2011.


  1. sud2002

    sud2002 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,059
    0
    Feb 11, 2011
    Progress is made in the gym not in fights, fights are more or less tests where you might find out things about a fighter.
     
  2. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล

    82,426
    1,478
    Sep 7, 2008
    :deal:deal:deal
     
  3. Beeston Brawler

    Beeston Brawler Comical Ali-egedly Full Member

    46,399
    15
    Jan 9, 2008
    All fair points, but is there any need for every fight to be on TV?

    I'm sure most fighters would fight more often to make extra cash..... even if it was short money would keep them ticking over both in terms of their activity levels and their bank balance.

    For me the opportunity to fight abroad is massive, Hatton fought about six times abroad before going there permanently, different atmosphere, different surroundings, probably a different style of opponent too - plus it gets your name out there a bit.

    The rounds that Groves got in on the Haye undercard and in Vegas will help him no end, even if lessons weren't learned for the fight with Anderson.

    It's all a learning process - these days it's any title fight regardless, rather than ''what do I need to work on'' or ''what haven't I faced'' or ''some experience against a partisan crowd could come in''.

    There's no right answers, but I think at the minute we are pushing everyone down the same path without actually thinking about the repercussions of what goes on, either positive or negative.

    I think it is, yes.

    Frankie has said himself that ''I want titles'', which is all well and good but what is better?

    A good opponent over ten rounds without a title on his turf, that you can still beat? Or a weak opponent that has a title for whatever reason?

    If you're good enough the big money, big prestige fights will come, yet nobody seems to want to wait, or put in the groundwork for them.

    Promoters are just as guilty, needing a quick return on their buck.
     
  4. wrimc

    wrimc Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,495
    5
    Oct 16, 2009

    I dont think i explained my point very well. There just isnt the time anymore for a fighter to have 15-20 fights below title level. Not enough TV dates not enough money in it. It costs too much to bring over an Edison Miranda for a saturday fight night.

    My point is that there needs to be continued progression with every fight that is taken. They learn as they go. To meet many of these styles now you have to get to ABC title level.

    This level therefore shouldnt be seen as the ultimate (which sadly it is for most of our fighters) but as a continued learning progression. We spend to long languishing at Euro level where we can dominate one style.

    There is often no point imo when somebody says he needs a few more Euro level fights. Well often it just means 3 more of the same fighter.

    I still dont think I have articulated my point well :think
     
  5. dftaylor

    dftaylor Writer, fanatic Full Member

    20,730
    1
    May 7, 2010
    I disagree with that. The Anderson fight was the lesson - it was better to be in that position against a guy like Kenny than someone further up the line, like a Froch. He now knows his limits. Against DeGale he showed a lot of savvy, something he wouldn’t have had had he not struggled with Anderson.
     
  6. Beeston Brawler

    Beeston Brawler Comical Ali-egedly Full Member

    46,399
    15
    Jan 9, 2008
    Yeah.... for me there isn't really a ''Euro-level'' anymore.

    It's really ''Euro-style'' or ''my promoter also has the British champion and wants us kept apart''.

    Most of the Europeans that come over aren't much better than the domestic equivalent, if at all?

    It's shortsightedness on the part of the promoters for me.
     
  7. dftaylor

    dftaylor Writer, fanatic Full Member

    20,730
    1
    May 7, 2010
    No, I get what you mean. With a lack of TV dates, and higher purses for the A-side fighter, promoters can’t wait around to develop a prospect. They need to push them quickly to maintain their investment and keep the fighter earning.

    Because of that, development and longevity take a back seat. It is undoubtedly the reason but it’s also why the best UK fighters are falling short at the highest level.

    It’s also why Groves beat DeGale – he had the variety and experience that James did not, so he was able to beat a guy he is evenly matched with.
     
  8. wrimc

    wrimc Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,495
    5
    Oct 16, 2009
    I think essentially what im advocating is going for the British title earlier after 10 rather than 15 fights having had decent domestic tests beforehand. Not languishing at Brit level too long unless there are solid challenges realistically Stuart Hall could have fought Mcdonnell after one defence against Davies Power and Donnelly didnt teach him anything. Then Euro title level again should be bypassed unless solid tests are there. Then go for eliminators because only then are you going to start learning different styles from different continents.

    If you fail at any level wash rinse repeat
     
  9. wrimc

    wrimc Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,495
    5
    Oct 16, 2009
    Yes its a middle ground between the two boxing isnt as popular so we can't build in the same way that we used to but prospects need to be advanced at a quick level but in a way that they will also learn as they go.

    Most divisions at Brit level have 2 maybe 3 good fighters once you have fought the other one or other 2 assuming you have fought some domestic contenders out there you should move upwards and onwards because at Brit level once you have fought one you have nearly fought them all.
     
  10. Euro title is a load of shite these days for the most part. As I tried telling our friend Slappy, but was he having it? No, it was bias on my part apparently.

    The champions might be somewhat better in SOME divisions, but the joke fighters you can face are terrible. The Euro title is masquerading as something its not, which is the best in Europe fighting each other, whereas at least the British title does what he claims to do.