My thoughts on Vitali Klitschko

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by lufcrazy, Sep 10, 2011.


  1. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    81,296
    21,768
    Sep 15, 2009
    I agree. beofre tonight I was convinced small mobile quicker fighters would beat him as well as tall boxer punchers.

    tonight and especially if he beats haye, I'll be happy that vitali can beat smaller more mobile fighters.
     
  2. PH|LLA

    PH|LLA VIP Member Full Member

    79,438
    2,646
    Feb 1, 2007
    bro, sorry but that is embarrassing. Vitali slow, feather fisted, a robot???? No fluidity? no jab? no handspeed?

    what???????????????????
     
  3. bremen

    bremen Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,843
    195
    Oct 11, 2010
    Adamek is fit and he is bigger than half of the fighters of 70s. As far as skills go, one doesn't become CW champ by being a bum.
     
  4. DDDUUDDDEE

    DDDUUDDDEE Undisputed Ambien (taker) Full Member

    17,608
    23
    Oct 25, 2010
    Not really, since he performed exactly as I thought he would (barring my margin of era by a round or two) and dominated from start to finish :huh

    Adamek was never that great at Heavyweight, and it's obvious he was never going to be. He struggled with what was basically a shot Michael Grant. Like I said it was a good performance by Vitali, but nothing the majority of people already didn't expect.
     
  5. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    81,296
    21,768
    Sep 15, 2009

    :lol::lol::lol: I'd love too see adamek try to make 175 and be competitive.
     
  6. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    81,296
    21,768
    Sep 15, 2009
    well if you called a 9th round stoppae you was wrong. I too was wrong since i called a close points win for tomasz. both of us need to return to the drawing board.
     
  7. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    81,296
    21,768
    Sep 15, 2009
    yeah i don't giove a ****; if you prefer i could pretend i never said that **** pre-fight but then I'd be a hypocrite.
     
  8. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    269
    Jul 22, 2004
    Your comparing Adamek to Marciano :lol: Come on LUFC. Adamek isn't skilled and is a Chad Dawson left over and went life and death with Briggs and Arreola. Marciano is a league above Adamek in skillset and power, he actually knows how to fight small, ie crouch, Adamek does not

    But yes Vitali may make a top20 when all is said and done
     
  9. PH|LLA

    PH|LLA VIP Member Full Member

    79,438
    2,646
    Feb 1, 2007
    no no it's ok I just don't get it cause I have always seen Vitali as an elite, intelligent, dynamic, and heavyhanded fighter who is unorthodox but very effectif.
     
  10. DDDUUDDDEE

    DDDUUDDDEE Undisputed Ambien (taker) Full Member

    17,608
    23
    Oct 25, 2010
    I didn't say he was a bum... but mediocre at Heavyweight?, yes, definitely.
     
  11. PetethePrince

    PetethePrince Slick & Redheaded Full Member

    28,760
    84
    May 30, 2009
    No he didn't. You bought that hype. Adamek was never going to Spinks Vitali. He doesn't have the speed, the mobility, the skills, nor the balance. Sure he can out-box ploddy Arreola. But that's it. Look at how Adamek did against Grant. He nearly lost like 3 rounds and got stunned. This is a 40 year old never was no hoper Grant. His balance is so **** McBride swooped him on the floor. Adamek has always always been hittable and easy to out-box if you had skills or speed. Dawson concisely out-boxed this guy at his natural weight (LHW). Vitali has the size, reach, and just as many skills. Adamek had nill chance. No chance to move and out-box Vitali on the outside. He held no advantages to do so anyway. He overcame nothing. This fight showed it too. You're right in only one sense. He was supposed to be. But he wasn't. We saw the fight. Adamek is not Haye. He held no advantages.

    Are you kidding me? You're probably right. Vitali crushes them because he's far too big and he's skilled. It's very likely a forgone win. But Adamek being used as some model for movement, speed, skills, and outside boxing abilities to prove an ATG like Tunney would have no chance is silly. Tunney would probably run himself to a decision loss but he wouldn't look nearly as bad.

    Didn't look so invincible or hot against Byrd in comparison to Adamek though, either.

    Michele Bachman caliber candidate, yeah.

    If the old age achievement argument is your basing for a top 20 placement that's fine, although a stretch for me. He's not much different because he hasn't had many fights and had rest from injuries. His record just doesn't stack up and warrant such placement IMHO.
     
  12. DDDUUDDDEE

    DDDUUDDDEE Undisputed Ambien (taker) Full Member

    17,608
    23
    Oct 25, 2010
    Jesus man!, I think you seriously overrated Adamek :scaredas:
     
  13. killuminix

    killuminix yes im back Full Member

    1,358
    3
    Jul 26, 2011
    dont get me wrong vitali is a badass and completely destroyed adamek but did you just compare marciano to adamek :patsch
     
  14. PaulieJ'z

    PaulieJ'z Member Full Member

    248
    38
    Apr 19, 2011
    A prime opponent? Adamek is horrible, the win proved nothing. And for the record, Marciano could bring much more to the table. He hit like a truck and was a true warrior. If he did lose to Vitali he would have went out like a warrior.
     
  15. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    81,296
    21,768
    Sep 15, 2009
    lol I've had a few bottles of stella but I stand by my point.

    not so much a comparison but more of an interpolation.

    watching tonight I can't see anything marciano would have done to defeat vitali.

    I'm not comapring the two, rocky is leagues above tomasz, but I see now way rocky could beat vitali and before tonight I wouldn't have been so convinced about that.