Once Haye stepped into the ring with Wlad, he quickly realized...

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by NeckBreaknAiken, Sep 11, 2011.


  1. AnotherFan

    AnotherFan Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,221
    2
    Dec 20, 2010
    I fail to understand this argument. Haye dived in over and over again with looping shots. Especially in the 12th. He was clearly going for the KO.
     
  2. Squire

    Squire Let's Go Champ Full Member

    9,120
    4
    Jun 22, 2009
    Great analysis, that's how I saw it
     
  3. NeckBreaknAiken

    NeckBreaknAiken Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    21,014
    4
    Jul 30, 2008
    :good:good:good

    10-2 or 9-3 really doesn't tell the story of the entire fight. Most of the rounds that Wlad won was due to being the semi-aggressor and nothing more.


    Haye definitely landed the only real meaningful punch of the fight, and wasn't even close to being as "pizza-faced" as Wlad.


    I understand people wanting to see Haye more aggressive, and take more chances... but I don't think he necessarily needs to be much more aggressive. Just a little smarter about it.
     
  4. PetethePrince

    PetethePrince Slick & Redheaded Full Member

    28,760
    84
    May 30, 2009
    The bottom line is Haye basically has fight the same exact way in every HW fight (Bearing the Barret fight for obvious reasons I think). He fought that way at CW, but even more so at HW has his activity and aggressiveness dropped.

    What I'm saying is that Vitali's well known aggressiveness would give Haye more opportunities with his natural counter-punching approach. Wlad is the better athlete that's faster. Considering Wlad's athleticism safety first approach you'd be doomed to try and out-box the man. Vitali on the other hand mixes it up, and while "fighting" and pushing back both K brothers has been a prototype for many fighters (Brewster, Sanders, Lewis, Byrd). It's while known that Vitali is harder to boss. I don't think Haye could aggressively try to bomb out Vitali, but could against Wlad because of their differences. At the same time Haye's approach against Wlad against Vitali would be much more effective in my honest opinion.

    Basically, I don't see how you can use Adamek as a prototype for how bombing out a K brother is ineffective. They are different. Wlad is so reactive and unwilling to fight that it's a good to force him to fight you off by attack him. Vitali is more of a natural fighter, more durable, more willing to mix it up. You can try a dog fight if you're Lennox Lewis, but because he's much more willing to mix it up he's easier to counter. Haye would lose to Vitali with his approach anyway so it's probably moot.
     
  5. PetethePrince

    PetethePrince Slick & Redheaded Full Member

    28,760
    84
    May 30, 2009
    A lot of faux rushes. The 12th round was his best point of created offense (Rather than merely trying to counter Wlad's jab with a right). It was Haye's shining moments. Had he pushed forward and attacked more he could've won. He just would have to do something he was uncomfortable with and take risks. Wlad was fearful of getting hit. I don't see him handling a caution to the wind approach ideally. Of course all this is easier to type up hence Wlad actually won. Wlad should have won too, he's the better fighter. Doesn't mean Haye couldn't have. Opportunities existed.
     
  6. AnotherFan

    AnotherFan Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,221
    2
    Dec 20, 2010
    Not the first time I have seen Wlad clinch after getting tagged. It's a part of his safety first approach. Saying he was hurt to this or that extent seems like guessing.

    Wlad knew there would be a fallow up every time Haye connected, since Hayes and Booths excuse for a "gameplan" was that Wlad would fold when the heat was turned on. Naturally Wlad was prepared to tie Haye up to prevent it. Was it really a big deal?
     
  7. PetethePrince

    PetethePrince Slick & Redheaded Full Member

    28,760
    84
    May 30, 2009
    How can you not see that trying to out-box and counter Wlad from a distance is not a nightmare strategy? Wlad is quite possibly one of the most difficult Heavyweights to out-box. Ali would plenty of difficulties against Wlad. Against Vitali? He would simply school him. That's why I'm saying Haye would have a much better chance with a less aggressive approach against Vitali!
     
  8. Post Box

    Post Box I'm back too, bitches Full Member

    14,484
    3
    Oct 12, 2010
    I definitely feel he underestimated wlads speed, everyone does
     
  9. Flash Jab

    Flash Jab Boxing Junkie banned

    12,335
    0
    Jul 29, 2010
    I think the only time the toe was an issue was when he was getting inside and Wlad was wrestling him to the floor. I don't think had the toe been fully healed it would've made a significant difference on his gameplan and his attempts to land the big one. Haye's always been wild with his shots, and the reach didn't help at all, not to mention Wlad simply doesn't take chances, doesn't come in with Hooks or Uppercuts and is always pumping out the jab/straight and has more than enough experience with the inside game to keep Haye off him or hold him if things get rough.

    Vitali will do no such thing though, he'll decimate him.
     
  10. NeckBreaknAiken

    NeckBreaknAiken Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    21,014
    4
    Jul 30, 2008
    I definitely agree with you about this.


    I never said I didn't agree.


    And in another thread, I have already said that i think Haye has a better shot against a much less mobile, slower, and more easily winded Vitali.


    I think we agree more than you may realize. Where we disagree is that I believe haye could have actually pulled off a distance typeof fight if he had smarter about his aggression.
     
  11. AnotherFan

    AnotherFan Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,221
    2
    Dec 20, 2010
    Wlad landed some straight rights that made Hayes head fling backwards. They were clear power shots that rocked Haye.

    Hayes looping shot made Wlad flinch and clinch, but it's hard to say if he really was affected by it. Wlad sometimes tie people up just to play it safe.

    You could also see Haye was more bruised afterwards.

    Wlad landed more meaingfull punches.
     
  12. Vysotsky

    Vysotsky Boxing Junkie banned

    12,797
    11
    Oct 14, 2009
    I agree with your points of Haye, his overall boxing skill & ring IQ are frankly terrible. That's what confuses me since alot of people, including yourself, say how Haye could have won the fight, list the stratagies Haye failed to employ but overlook the fact that those skills are things that David doesn't possess.

    Your observations on his ability to effectively utilize that athleticism with his footspeed along with his lack of in fighting ability and non existant combination punching are the most frequent things people mention. Haye is the fighter he is, what he is not is an amalgamation of Ali's footwork circa 1966 & Tyson's combination punching and in side game.

    Regarding Vova it isn't just me like i said Byrd, Chambers, Haye, Ibragimov, Chagaev seemed to be impressed too and i do think there's a difference in the time periods you mentioned. Klychko had that athleticism but didn't utilize it properly. Under Stewart his defensive footwork has improved imo plus clinching and tieing a guy up when they got inside was a completely foreign concept to him.

    He used to be alot more willing to stand in the pocket and try to pull away ala Vitali make you miss or block shots then counter. Now he's either punching you in the face or simply out of his opponents range. In the Peter fight that aspect of his footwork along with the unfamiliararity with clinching made a big difference. Against Brewster he was beating the **** out of him until Don King's liquid voodoo took effect (and was his first fight with Manny some the above observations apply)
     
  13. man_on_the_spot

    man_on_the_spot Active Member Full Member

    578
    2
    Jul 13, 2007
    Pete pretty much made my point.
    Haye simply is not a pressure fighter. He fought like he fights as his best as a counter-puncher. Vlad simply is not a good style match-up for him.
    Haye is really a very athletic and smart fighter and really respect his skills,but I doubt that bullsrushing Wlad would have done him any good for the simple fact that he is not comfortable with that style and lacks some key skills to pull it off at a world level. You don't change your style so drastically going up against the best HW in the world.

    There were some comparisons due to his speed and power, but Haye is not Mike Tyson. People need to accept that. He does not have the mental set-up and durability to be successfull with that style at HW. It takes time to learn fighting styles. It does not comoe overnight.
     
  14. Reppin501

    Reppin501 The People's Champ Full Member

    21,943
    3,300
    Apr 26, 2010
    I thought Haye was absolute **** and other than avoiding being hit brought nothing to the table. He was an embarrassment and his "effort" was putrid IMO.
     
  15. man_on_the_spot

    man_on_the_spot Active Member Full Member

    578
    2
    Jul 13, 2007
    I also don't think Wlad was terribly hurt in the 12th. Rather caution. He came back with 2 1-2 and pretty much got Haye backpeddling again the rest of the round.