should wlad vs. haye of been ruled a draw

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Koman600, Sep 11, 2011.


  1. Kid Presentable

    Kid Presentable Facial Blocking Full Member

    2,818
    1
    Sep 14, 2008

    a draw? nonsense your just upset your ****** hero never got beaten down by either klitschko brother. maybe when hes released he'l get a shot?
     
  2. Hamilton

    Hamilton Member Full Member

    278
    0
    Nov 26, 2010
    This could be the depository for the dumbest post I have ever checked out. I thought for sure there would be an angle, but no... two months after Haye embarrasses himself some kid in his basement right before dinner posts this. Just when I think I'm out, they pull me back in..... Jesus.
     
  3. TitoMahawk

    TitoMahawk Retarded trolls detector Full Member

    2,381
    0
    Jul 12, 2011
    :deal
     
  4. Leonit

    Leonit Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,331
    4
    Jan 6, 2009
    Haye should have taken 10 points lead to compensate for his broken toe. I feel that this was only fair....
     
  5. Bazooka

    Bazooka Pimp C Wants 2 Be Me Full Member

    44,390
    5
    Oct 23, 2005
    Maybe in your mind, but in reality neither guy did **** to win a draw would have been better had it been ruled it and forced a rematch and like another poster said perhaps that will learn both fighters to bring it next time round

    You can talk all the **** you want about Haye, But Wlads performance was nothing different in my eyes.... and you are proud of his performance? whats that say about you.
     
  6. Rob887

    Rob887 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,546
    0
    May 14, 2011
    Wlad did enough to win, but in reality it certainly was no clear total domination. Most the rounds were fairly close and a few extra landed punches either way could have swung many of the rounds to either fighter.
     
  7. Hamilton

    Hamilton Member Full Member

    278
    0
    Nov 26, 2010
    Stop it. Pack your lunch for school tomorrow. It's not my eyes, genius. The eyes of all judges and professional observers and the co-participant (Haye) all recognize that Haye lost and lost big. This is not 'Nam, Walter. There are rules.
     
  8. Bazooka

    Bazooka Pimp C Wants 2 Be Me Full Member

    44,390
    5
    Oct 23, 2005

    Exactly the eyes of the judges who will give the close rounds to the champion and the HBO star right?

    Haye did not lose big, Haye lost but not Big you want to see Big look at Sanders vs Wlad, Or brewster vs Wlad or Purritty vs Wlad getting knocked the **** out is lossing big this fight was hardly dominant by Wlad

    Get the **** out of here kid grown folk are talking real boxing this isnt no klitschko **** gobbeling contest
     
  9. BoxingFanNo1

    BoxingFanNo1 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,867
    13
    Jan 20, 2009
    It was a **** fight, both boxers were pretty ****, Hayes **** was shittier **** than Wlads ****.
     
  10. Bazooka

    Bazooka Pimp C Wants 2 Be Me Full Member

    44,390
    5
    Oct 23, 2005

    On paper in terms of actual punches thrown and landed close fight.
     
  11. Rob887

    Rob887 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,546
    0
    May 14, 2011
    He didn't dominate, he barely landed any meaningful punches himself.
     
  12. Heavyrighthand

    Heavyrighthand Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,149
    1,044
    Jan 29, 2005

    Agree.

    Wlad won a legit decision, but it was far from being one sided fight, as some seem to say it was.

    Neither fighter landed alot, and even in winning, Wlad was mostly ineffective with is normally very effective jab. As you said, saying Wlad won 10 rounds is misleading cause many of the rounds were hard to call, as so few punches were landed.

    i think a rematch is certianly warranted.............
     
  13. Hamilton

    Hamilton Member Full Member

    278
    0
    Nov 26, 2010
    I know you have a bus to catch early tomorrow for middle school, so I don't want to keep you up, but who won the fight between Haye and Vlad? Who had the excuses? Who ran backwards for twelve rounds? Who had the toe defense? And since the "grown folk" are talking "boxing," shouldn't you be brushing your teeth and admiring your Haye posters on the walls in your mom and dad's house?
     
  14. ocelot

    ocelot Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,122
    13
    Nov 21, 2007
    Yes, should have been a draw, of course. That, or Princess Haye should have gotten the win - if for no other reason than she fought with a bad toe. I thought Princess had it written into every contract that she was guaranteed a 'draw' at a minimum? The judges must have overlooked that part of the agreement. She would make a great ballet dancer, had she chosen a different profession, with all those dramatic falls to her knees.
     
  15. Bazooka

    Bazooka Pimp C Wants 2 Be Me Full Member

    44,390
    5
    Oct 23, 2005
    Ha~ resorting to the insults now, I know its usally a last ditch effert to try and convince the people around you that your telling the truth.
    Wlad did win but it was soley on him comming forward, again dont call it running when Wlad doesnt have the skill or know how to cut off the ring.

    it was just as much Wlads performance as it was Hayes... and lets not talk about the way either guy fought, Wlad jabs and grabs much like John Ruiz infact in my mind he is nothing more than a carbon copy of Ruiz...

    When you have all those advantages and talk like your going to beat someones ass and punish them for a full 12 rounds then turn around and do nothing, dont come looking for my ****ing approval you wont get no where.

    on paper Wlad got the win but in terms of the fight, there wasnt no fight in the entire 12 rounds so how can you claim victory in a fight that never happend?