Was George Foreman REALLY any better than the likes of Sam Peter?

Then they wonder why people hate klit lickers

 

:?


Also, atsch in either case.

Crystal clear edge to Foreman. He was only stopped once, and it had next to nothing to do with "chin".

 

You forgot to list Chuck Norris, Bruce Lee, Optimus Prime, King Kong, and The Predator.

Not only would Peter KO all of them, he would do it while pruning a bonzai tree, grilling 30 steaks, and getting a pedicure. Dressed as a cowboy.

 

Troll

 

You're a ****ing *****. Embarrassing.

 

Foreman shits all over that unskilled caveman. If Peter fought exactly the same opposition in the order that Foreman fought them, he wouldn't even make it through all of them. He'd be brain-dead somewhere because of how much he gets hit.

 

lets be serious
King Kong beats peter- unanimous decision

 

And Vitali Klitschko lost to Chris Byrd a light heavyweight with no power but since Foreman went 10 with Peralta you are saying he is overrated? What a ****ing moron

 

****, I dunno how it happened but you actually reeled me in you **** :good

 

:deal

 

I'd agree with a SD, but no way that great ape gets all the judges.

 

The real joke is labeling "Edge to Foreman" in the skill category as if he's just barely more skilled than Peter.

 

I dont really think theres any heavyweight out there today that can match the power of Prime Big George .

 

When you put chin twice, I knew you were thinking too much. Who did Sam Peter beat that was good besides ex middleweight champion James Toney?

 

I'm amazed you can post here, I really am. You can boot up your computer and access the internet and everything. You probably even dressed yourself this morning...