FW to leave Sky according to Twitter

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by HMSTempleGarden, Sep 20, 2011.


  1. Jonsey

    Jonsey Boxing Junkie banned

    11,130
    0
    May 17, 2011
    you gotta think Top Rank the biggest promoter in the world have been doing independent PPV's for year. However the major difference is that this is for the smaller show and the major events our supported by a network like HBO.
     
  2. pong

    pong Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,732
    1
    May 11, 2011
    uk boxing looks to be turning into aussie boxing sad ****
     
  3. Jonsey

    Jonsey Boxing Junkie banned

    11,130
    0
    May 17, 2011
    ****** isn't stupid is he. He is not going to just put his own shows on.

    reckon we see Hopkins vs Dawson and Pacquiao vs Marquez on there.

    How about a Bunce hour to.
     
  4. dftaylor

    dftaylor Writer, fanatic Full Member

    20,730
    1
    May 7, 2010
    TR is also very good at targeting its fighters' natural demographics - I don't think it makes many losses on these shows. It covers costs from the live gate and boosts revenue from PPV.
     
  5. pathmanc1986

    pathmanc1986 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,853
    5
    Oct 4, 2008
    his own judges, his own fighters, his own tv set up....for PPV....on a channel only available on Sky?


    Boke
     
  6. pathmanc1986

    pathmanc1986 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,853
    5
    Oct 4, 2008
    Also, how can Sky allow this?


    VVarren sends them up the **** creek by taking all his fighters away and then they still allow him to broadcast a channel on their service?



    Imagine if sky told him to take a run and jump - he'd really be screwed then
     
  7. KOMAN

    KOMAN Member Full Member

    178
    0
    Dec 12, 2010
    Won't happen because if Boxnation pays the fee the to broadcast on Sky Platform, there ain't a single thing they can do about it.
     
  8. pathmanc1986

    pathmanc1986 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,853
    5
    Oct 4, 2008


    You dont think their lawyers could find a way around that?:deal
     
  9. KOMAN

    KOMAN Member Full Member

    178
    0
    Dec 12, 2010
    It's water tight, I work in TV and we have to pay it, and as long as you do you can broadcast.
     
  10. ishy

    ishy Loyal Member Full Member

    44,755
    7
    Mar 9, 2008
    This.

    Frank's being in this game for years, he won't do something stupid.
     
  11. dftaylor

    dftaylor Writer, fanatic Full Member

    20,730
    1
    May 7, 2010
    I write this a lot, so maybe I should save it for CTRL+V purposes...

    Sky cannot restrict a competitor's advertising UNLESS it contravenes the advertising standards. They also cannot refuse access to their platform UNLESS the content is illegal, unsavoury or violates copyright in some way.

    Also, why would they care? It's a low audience share thing for them and causes them more bother than it's worth. This way they make money from the license fee and if it's PPV they get a cut of that too.
     
  12. rampant

    rampant Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,631
    9
    Feb 24, 2011
    I'd consider myself a fairly casusal fan and I wont be paying **** all for Boxnation or for any of Frank ******'s PPV **** cards.

    I haven only paid for 1 or 2 Froch fights on Primetime and Primetime needs to improve before charging the same as SKY.

    I will watch all free boxing and I watch alot more MMA now, never used to watch MMA but since Its only a £10 a month with no hidden extras, ie PPV on top and there is alot of UFC events and other Sports, its a good deal.

    this could destroy boxing further and make it even more of a business...shame!
     
  13. pathmanc1986

    pathmanc1986 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,853
    5
    Oct 4, 2008

    Ive never seen you write it before, so there you go.



    This is the same company that hacked a dead childs phone for a story, you think advert competitiveness will stop them doing some **** like this?

    Maybe not in this instance because of the circumstances you pointed out correctly, but if they really wanted to, anything is possible. I gleaned this from the 6 years i spent studying law. Loopholes exist man, EVERYWHERE!
     
  14. liger05

    liger05 puroresu fan 4 life!! Full Member

    4,101
    21
    Nov 11, 2008
    Remember on ringside a few weeks back where they did they short interview with all the promoters about the new season and ****** was one of them.

    What a shame for Kevin Mitchell. beats Murray in a classic and now we wont see him.
     
  15. dftaylor

    dftaylor Writer, fanatic Full Member

    20,730
    1
    May 7, 2010
    Ah, but News Corp doesn't outright own Sky - although it did try, obviously! Sorry, I don't mean to sound patronising - I just finished writing an internal paper on this very topic for a big media company.

    Put it this way, there are other companies who are VERY interested in using Sky as a platform, possibly competing with its existing services.

    If I remember right, Sky need to maintain neutrality if it wants to keep the free-to-air channels like BBC and ITV. That said, it's already been censured by OfCom for its non-competitive pricing:

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2010/mar/31/ofcom-sky-sports-price-cut

    Sky have appealed and I know the debate is still going...

    http://www.mediaweek.co.uk/news/1009043/Parties-appeal-Ofcom-pay-TV-ruling-pleases-no-one/

    So if Sky DID try to restrict someone else, it would be in a very difficult situation with the current crackdown on the media.

    For once, the business of the sport is more interesting than the sport, IMO! :lol: