Clay v liston in 63: any difference?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by lufcrazy, Sep 21, 2011.


  1. teeto

    teeto Obsessed with Boxing banned

    28,075
    54
    Oct 15, 2007
    yeah I heard about the Ingo thing too, he apparently embarrassed him, I would expect that though to be brutally honest. I think Ali wins in 63 and I'd be putting money down if I had the power of hindsight, no doubt in my mind, I think he wins big personally. I understand what you're saying, and when I said the word 'never' I wasn't talking about Ali being a novice, because I think it's pretty much a a true reflection of what this match up really is that we're having to make Ali a novice to give Liston a good chance of winning, so I wasn't even thinking on those lines.

    But yeah, if we're gunna make Ali a novice then Liston's got a better chance.
     
  2. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    82,092
    22,173
    Sep 15, 2009
    I completely agree and only through naivety or false bravado could ali lose, something he'd ironed out of his game by 62/63.

    I don't buy into the notion of liston being ill prepared or too old. I think liston was pretty much as good as ever by the clay fight maybe a touch slower but not much. Stylistically ali is the only hw I can think of with the combo of size speed and chin required to beat sonny and unless a green clay tried trading, he'd always beat liston imo.

    Other quick heavyweights like floyd, tunney etc weren't big enough to keep liston away imo, but ali had the perfect style (with hindsight).

    In 61 I think it's the last year liston would have been able to beat clay.

    My first thought was if henry could catch him, so could sonny and he might well, but after that punch ali would recover and dance away again.

    So yeah I largely agree with what your saying but espn classic just showed the liston-floyd rematch and clay was announced as a guest so I thought i'd throw a thread out and see what people say :good
     
  3. RoosterC

    RoosterC Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,242
    7
    Dec 23, 2010
    Ali was prime in the early 1970's but still a very good fighter in the mid 60's.
     
  4. mhubbard

    mhubbard New Member Full Member

    90
    0
    May 3, 2010
    Ali was in his prime in 1967 in his fight with Cleveland Williams. Or even maybe between 1968-1970 but we will never know, but I would say at 1967 he was at his best.
     
  5. BUDW

    BUDW Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,928
    825
    Nov 23, 2007
    Depends if the mob is involved
     
  6. Longhhorn71

    Longhhorn71 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,714
    3,456
    Jan 6, 2007
    Clay (202 lb) barely got by 188 lb Doug Jones in 1963.

    Liston would have been at 215 lbs.

    Clay had become much stronger a year later.
     
  7. klompton

    klompton Boxing Addict banned

    5,667
    39
    Jul 6, 2005

    I dont know if I would agree that Ali was "prime" in the 70s (although an argument can be made IMO) but its a complete, uneducated media myth that Ali was prime when he fought Williams. This victory was blown WAY out of wack by certain people in the media who either didnt understand or didnt care that Williams was never the same after being shot in the stomach and certainly had not looked good against a top opponent in several years. He was basically on the comeback trail and hadnt really looked that great even against the setups he was picked. What Williams was was a name and one that had been very recognizable. Because Ali performed so well against that shell of a fighter hiding behind a name this is seen as his prime. It wasnt, at least not because of that performance. Nobody calls his fights with Chuvalo or Terrell "his prime" because even in beating (some might say dominating) those two he didnt look unstoppable and yet, coincidently those are the two guys he fought before his exile who were in THEIR prime. This is why I say that you can argue that when he came back in the 1970s he was in his prime. Because he came back against a class of fighter (Bonavena, Quarry, Frazier, Ellis, and Mathis) who were better, if not head and shoulders better than those he fought before his exile, and for the most part in their primes, and he showed extremely well against them.
     
  8. choklab

    choklab cocoon of horror Full Member

    27,674
    7,654
    Dec 31, 2009

    williams was never ever proven at world level before he was shot anyway. Ali looked so good against that level of opponent because williams was a step down from all the other chalengers he faced. still, ali would not have looked better against that kind of target practice at a later date.
     
  9. Duodenum

    Duodenum Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,604
    290
    Apr 18, 2007
    His punch resistance against Doug Jones and Henry Cooper in 1963 did not look adequate for withstanding Liston's shots to the head. Nor did his own power against these 180 pounders look sufficient for putting a dent in Sonny.

    The speed and mobility would still be a major issue for Liston to contend with though, and the upstart would have been on very high alert for dealing with his power. The quantum improvement in Clay from Cooper I to Liston I was akin to that in Holmes from Arrington to Shavers I, more dramatic than the devolution in Sonny from Patterson II to Clay.
     
  10. teeto

    teeto Obsessed with Boxing banned

    28,075
    54
    Oct 15, 2007
    :good
     
  11. Stevie G

    Stevie G Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,213
    8,753
    Jul 17, 2009
    I was thinking about the Jones fight myself. Clay,as was,would still have been good enough to beat Liston in that year.
     
  12. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    269
    Jul 22, 2004
    Ali was tooling about against Cooper though, that's why he got put down, he was trying to predict the round and didn't want to put him away before the 5th round which he predicted, you saw a different fighter in that 5th round when he started fighting properly

    Ali wouldn't screw around against Liston, who probably scared him, he said to Dundee when walking to the ring 'so do you think we can pull this off' despite months of ridiculing Liston
     
  13. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    82,092
    22,173
    Sep 15, 2009
    Even if liston catches ali at some point he won't knock him out cold and ali's powers of recovery where too great for liston to break him down imo.

    I do think prime for prime frazier beats ali but not liston.
     
  14. itrymariti

    itrymariti Cañas! Full Member

    13,728
    47
    Sep 6, 2008
    Liston knocks him out in 2, maybe 3 rounds. Liston's prime was as an amateur as anybody who studies the records knows, he was washed up when Fraudhammad got to him, prime for prime Ali does much better though, he might see round 5.
     
  15. itrymariti

    itrymariti Cañas! Full Member

    13,728
    47
    Sep 6, 2008
    Patterson would also have knocked Clay out in '63