Better pressure fighter then Floyd Mayweather in boxing today?

Intelligent pressure is what the *****s feel when they can not actually argue. It is just a plain pressure but to them, it entails intelligent.

Example ; Michiganwarrior's statement - "I recognize that Pacquiao is the best offensive fighter , if not the best offensive fighter ever, ........, therefore I not not biased."

Ring......Ring......Hello? Mental hospital?

Apparently, the revelation that Pacquiao is a great offensive fighter is an intelligent pressre because you need inteliligence to know what Stevie Wonder and Ray Charles (RIP) know, which is -Pac is a great offensive fighter.

And the more moronic? Apparently when you state the obvious and acknowledge the obvious, you don't become biased.

So technically, when I say Gayweather is a great defensive fighter, I am not biased.

 

Lets try this again

http://www.google.com/#sclient=psy-...l0&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.&fp=504df108955b74df


Does your internet cafe block google or something? :rofl


Tell me ******* do you not see the difference in Margaritos pressure and Mike Tysons pressure lol?

 

Great, it gets me to the main page of google....

What proof do I need more?

 

Style: Estrada is an all action, intelligent pressure fighter who utilizes superior conditioning and combinations to wear his opponents down.


http://www.boxing360.com/fighters/david_estrada.php



Ouch *******.

 

The Argentine fighter is a heavy handed stalker who gradually breaks his opponents down but he does so with careful counter punches, intelligent pressure and a pin-point body attack.

http://ringtv.craveonline.com/blog/167805-head-to-head-alexander-vs-matthysse


REady to throw in the towel *******?

 

So are you actually saying that someone categorized Tyson's pressure as intelligent pressure or it is just you bollocks opinion again.

Sure, Tyson's pressure is more effective, but to call it intelligent?

By the same virtue, would you consider Gayweather's counters as intelligent counters relative to someone as not equally effective?

So you want to stake your ground that pressure can be categorized now to :

A. Plain pressure

B. Intelligent Pressure

C. Intermediate between A and B

 

stick to you kfc. :rofl

 

Michigan is owning that ass

 

What is the difference between smart pressure, intelligent pressure, etc?


When journalist use these terms, are this terms actually inscribed in boxing lexicon?

Generic descriptions to try to describe a fighter may not necessarily be an accepted boxing terms. And multiple terms are actually like that.

The true measure of terms universal acceptance is when it actually appears in recognized lexicons, and I am still waiting.

 

Tysons pressure was more effective because he fought intelligently, I.e he was trained by one of the greatest boxing minds ever. While pressuring he slipped punches and countered. Every shot he threw was thrown with pin point accuracy to do the greatest damage. He set up his punches, he set up his combinations.

In comparison Margarito, comes in, gets punched in the face 100 times and hopes he wears his opponent out.


Wow, cant believe I have to explain such a simple concept.

 

No one does it better. Floyd had Ortiz scared to fight toe to toe like he fought Berto. Pacquiao will jump in and out as well.

 

So we've gone from Floyd fans making up intelligent pressure, to it being a generic description, even though its all over the web and is a common accepted boxing termed employed all the time as I have showed.


Wow just wow. Keep digging boy.

 

Not hard. If I switched the subject from athletics, to how many chickens do I have to kill to reach level 50 in Everquest im sure they'd slaughter me.

 

:rofl, what is new. *****s slapping each other's back.

short of nallege giving himself a thumbs up. atsch

we are not so much interested in pressure, intelligent or not.

we are more interested on when void will drag his ****** ass up the ring.

yep, void wins in all fantasy fights.

 

you should stick to the dog kettle :rofl