Why is there so much stock put in his opinion? There are people on this site far better at picking fights, yet you wouldn't make a thread if they said Barker has a chance. Does sharing your opinion using the medium of youtube instead of a forum make it more valuable?
Hes not successful at what he does, you can easily establish this by taking a look at his **** apartment
Any potato headed black guy with a headset and a speeded up (yet somehow really slowed down) Stephen Hawking voicebox is bound to get a bit of attention, especially when he's so consistently wrong with his gambling 'advice'.
It should be 1000/1 for a UD win and 100/1 for a KO win. I would put a quid on both of those. It really is a mismatch.
Martinez isn't as great as everyone makes him out to be. I mean, a win over Paul Williams and a win over a destroyed Pavlik and suddenly he is unbeatable. I think Darren does a lot better than most think (he'll probably lose tho)
He is guilty of switching off during rounds a bit too I think. Barker is bigger, perhaps he can force him back and outwork him. Don't see it though.