heavyweight weight difference is different then other "weight differences"

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Koman600, Sep 27, 2011.


Page 1 of 2
  1. Koman600

    Koman600 Guest

    there is a reason, why HW is unlimited... its because weight difference in HW does not meant that much compared to weights in the lower classes,

    and that is why the lower closes are usually 5,7,10 lb difference


    again another example....a 250lb guy facing a 230lb guy is completely different, then a 160lb guy facing a 140lb guy


    yes of course weight difference is important, but it does not make a big difference in HW.. then it does in the lower weights...


    a 260lb guy facing a 230 guy, is completely different the a 180 guy facing a 150 guy..


    the 230 guy has a lot better chance against the 260 guy, then the 150 guy has against the 180

    the higher you go, the weight difference does not mean that much, the lower you go, weight difference is important
     
    Koman600, Sep 27, 2011
    Koman600, Sep 27, 2011
    #1
  2. Derrick_Rose

    Derrick_Rose Guest

    Congrats Einstein! You deserve an award for this post!
     
    Derrick_Rose, Sep 27, 2011
    Derrick_Rose, Sep 27, 2011
    #2
  3. iceman71

    iceman71 WBC SILVER Champion Full Member

    51,687
    23
    Jul 28, 2008
    This content is protected
     
    iceman71, Sep 27, 2011
    iceman71, Sep 27, 2011
    #3
  4. Ilesey

    Ilesey ~ Full Member

    38,201
    2,600
    Jul 22, 2004
    **** off, bum brain.
     
    Ilesey, Sep 27, 2011
    Ilesey, Sep 27, 2011
    #4
  5. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    401,771
    83,585
    Nov 30, 2006
    This content is protected
     
    IntentionalButt, Sep 27, 2011
    IntentionalButt, Sep 27, 2011
    #5
  6. iceman71

    iceman71 WBC SILVER Champion Full Member

    51,687
    23
    Jul 28, 2008
    This content is protected
     
    iceman71, Sep 27, 2011
    iceman71, Sep 27, 2011
    #6
  7. vnyc

    vnyc Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    7,078
    638
    Nov 8, 2009
    **** off
     
    vnyc, Sep 27, 2011
    vnyc, Sep 27, 2011
    #7
  8. bremen

    bremen Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,843
    196
    Oct 11, 2010
    This content is protected
     
    bremen, Sep 27, 2011
    bremen, Sep 27, 2011
    #8
  9. Gander Tasco

    Gander Tasco Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,438
    24
    Mar 13, 2010
    [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zuMJBLio7FU&feature=related[/ame]
     
    Gander Tasco, Sep 27, 2011
    Gander Tasco, Sep 27, 2011
    #9
  10. pinkston

    pinkston New Member Full Member

    12
    0
    Nov 14, 2009
    That was great :rofl
     
    pinkston, Sep 27, 2011
    pinkston, Sep 27, 2011
    #10
  11. Vince Voltage

    Vince Voltage Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,081
    1,339
    Jan 1, 2011
    I used to think this, but don't really anymore. In fact, I'm so ****ing sick of hearing people say **** like "any time a 200 pound man hits you, it's going to hurt" etc.. That's just become a grotesque excuse for having giants beat the hell out of smaller guys. I think the divisions are probably going to have to be realigned.

    Have any of you watched Klitschko fights in the presence of casual boxing fans, or perhaps non-fans? They look at these fights and say "But it isn't fair, that huge guy is beating the **** out of that little guy". A logical human can see this. Boxing fans are not logical and we respond to this by saying "Oh, see, it doesn't matter, because that little guy is over 200 pounds which means he's a massive threat to anyone, and therefore he just has an equal chance in this fight"....and we say it over and over as the little guy is chased down, kind of as if a leopard was thrown in to face a Siberian tiger. I used to agree with the poster, but don't anymore.
     
    Vince Voltage, Sep 27, 2011
    Vince Voltage, Sep 27, 2011
    #11
  12. TFT3

    TFT3 Member Full Member

    396
    0
    Mar 20, 2010
    TFT3, Sep 27, 2011
    TFT3, Sep 27, 2011
    #12
  13. itsa huge bitch

    itsa huge bitch Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,264
    1
    Mar 9, 2011
    so smaller heavyweights have never beaten bigger ones??should it be a rule if your big your not aloud to posses skill aswell??what about speed should bigger guys not be aloud to have speed..when mentioning bigger heavys against smaller why do people always use the k bros??they are stand outs..haye.adamak,chambers for example could compete and win against most of the super heavys of todays division..so i dont get what the problem is
     
    itsa huge bitch, Sep 28, 2011
    itsa huge bitch, Sep 28, 2011
    #13
  14. JohnAnthony

    JohnAnthony Boxing Junkie banned

    9,988
    4
    Jul 9, 2010
    JohnAnthony, Sep 28, 2011
    JohnAnthony, Sep 28, 2011
    #14
  15. KO-KING

    KO-KING Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,539
    9
    Feb 15, 2011
    well thought out joke,
     
    KO-KING, Sep 28, 2011
    KO-KING, Sep 28, 2011
    #15
Page 1 of 2