Ring Magazines Assesment of Darren Barker

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by JohnAnthony, Oct 3, 2011.


  1. JohnAnthony

    JohnAnthony Boxing Junkie banned

    9,988
    4
    Jul 9, 2010
    [url]
    This content is protected
    [/url]: I don’t get it. A bloke presumably dreams of fighting for a world title from the time he takes up boxing as a child or young man. Then, when he has the opportunity to realize that dream, he doesn’t give himself a chance to win. You gotta throw punches if you want your hand raised, mate. Barker obviously is a good boxer. Martinez struggled to hit him cleanly for almost the entire fight, which is saying something give the champ’s ability. However, that’s only part of the equation. You’re merely surviving if you don’t take the risks necessary to score points or hurt your opponent, which describes Barker’s night. Yes, the final result probably gives us an idea of what would’ve happened had Barker taken risks earlier. Still, unless you have the ability of a Pernell Whitaker, that’s generally the only way to win. And isn’t that the objective? To win


    What are everyones thoughts on this? I Think its terribly disrspectful. the guy was a 26-1 underdog, and going into round 11 he was only a couple of rounds down against the best middleweight in the world.
    He bloodied up martinez and fought the fight of his life.
    For the Ring to put this as there conclusion of his night is disgraceful. He was a 26-1 undergod for christ sake, and he was very competetive.
     
  2. larsker

    larsker Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,342
    79
    Jun 5, 2010
    Rosenthal is ****
     
  3. larsker

    larsker Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,342
    79
    Jun 5, 2010
  4. Earl-hickey

    Earl-hickey Boxing Junkie banned

    14,011
    3
    Oct 31, 2010
    The Ring's reporting has about as much clout as the daily star these days, and with articles like this you can see why
     
  5. JohnAnthony

    JohnAnthony Boxing Junkie banned

    9,988
    4
    Jul 9, 2010
    and thinking about it. when was the last time a 26-1 underdog performed that well in a fight?
     
  6. el mosquito

    el mosquito Boxing Addict banned

    5,805
    0
    Nov 20, 2009
    Prior to this fight, Martinez was a superman. Then Barker broke his nose and made him realize he is a mortal man
     
  7. DobyZhee

    DobyZhee Loyal Member

    46,732
    14,181
    Mar 5, 2006
    f*ck the Ring Magazine..

    let's see one of them a holes get in one.
     
  8. JohnAnthony

    JohnAnthony Boxing Junkie banned

    9,988
    4
    Jul 9, 2010
    you probably didnt see it in america because i heard HBO didnt even offer him an interview after.
    But in the interview for English TV, he weas co crushed and gutted about losing the fight he could barely talk. To question that this guy didnt want to win the fight is ludicrous
     
  9. Bogotazo

    Bogotazo Amateur Full Member

    31,381
    1,134
    Oct 17, 2009
    Too harsh. There's a grain of truth in it since there's always room for criticism in a performance, but he outperformed everyone's expectations.
     
  10. CASH_718

    CASH_718 "You ****ed Healy?" Full Member

    18,614
    8
    Apr 10, 2005
    Yeah HBO was disgusting they didnt give Barker any credit and pretty much said the same thing as The Ring is saying right now. Barker did the best he could and made Sergio look like **** for 90% of the fight. One thing HBO got right was that they said Barker is definitely laying the blueprint for how to beat Sergio and I agree 100%.
     
  11. TG1

    TG1 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,965
    11
    Mar 4, 2010
  12. the cobra

    the cobra Awesomeizationism! Full Member

    12,028
    106
    Jun 30, 2008
    The whole idea that Barker should have simply thrown more is foolish. He made up for a massive gap in talent by fighting a solid, technical fight, and managed to generally walk the Middleweight champion of the world down behind a good jab. It's not like Martinez was constantly outworking him either, he'd just let loose a burst of several punches - almost all of them blocked - and then go back to inactivity himself.

    I hate the little bit about Whitaker too. Yeah, he was always getting outworked. :roll:
     
  13. JohnAnthony

    JohnAnthony Boxing Junkie banned

    9,988
    4
    Jul 9, 2010
    i agree. especially the first 6 rounds. i had him winning. as martinez was barely landing, and barker was far more accurate.
     
  14. carlos200587

    carlos200587 Active Member Full Member

    1,471
    0
    Jun 6, 2010
    barker did great props to him, the ring magazine is full of ****s

    biast mother****ers
     
  15. Uncle Rico

    Uncle Rico Loyal Member Full Member

    39,748
    3
    Jun 28, 2009
    What a joke. HBO didn't interview him, either? That's disgraceful.

    Barker can hold his head high. I thought he performed exceptionally well. His stamina wained in second half, which is why he stopped moving and throwing punches. But before that, he had Martinez puzzled. Going into the 10th round, he was only behind by one round on my scorecard. If that's called surviving, then I honestly don't know what to say.