By your response, it is clearly you. You havent read the full interview, just a one line sound grab from a tabloid tv show. Then generalised and extrapolated to your hearts content to satisfy your anti mundine feelings. When exposed for this you crack the shits!
It's funny how you keep referring to a transcript of the full interview - how many questions was Mundine asked about 9/11, since you keep referring to it as a full interview? I watched it on live morning TV, so it's time you started backing up your claims of him being set up, taken out of context, etc, here, instead of continually referring to this 'full interview' that apparently excuses what he said. Can you do that or not?
Are u implying that mundine said he felt that the ppl in the trade towers brought it upon themselves, Instead of america brought it on themselves from fukin around in the middle east?
Regardless, he is stupid for saying it at such a sensitive time where lots of innocent lives were lost
He quite clearly states it was not an act of terrorism. "They call it an act of terrorism but if you can understand religion and our way of life, it's not about terrorism," said the Australian at the time. "It's about fighting for God's laws, and America's brought it upon themselves (for) what they've done in the history of time." He later apologised for what he said, so obviously he realised what he said was not good: "I condemn these killings . . . on both sides, any side, these killings, these acts of terrorism or whatever," he said. "I am a person that fights for peace and harmony. I condemn any forms of attacks or violence around the world. "I want to apologize to the people that caught them statements but now you heard me clarify myself tonight." [url]http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/boxing/1615674.stm[/url]
**** off dickhead, you're one of the 3 arseclowns here defending him for it, if you don't know **** about it **** off and stop trying to act the smarty.
Where does anyone say he said that, dickhead? You know you're desperate when you're trying to argue semantics over what that stupid **** said :-( It was soon after 9/11, he was asked what his thoughts were on it, and he said America brought on on themselves. The ****wit was trying to be controversial, he got more than he bargained for with the general public's reaction to it, and tried to apologise for it later and claim he was "taken out of context" when no such thing occurred. What happened was he opened his dumb mouth and said the first thing that popped into his head trying to be the token muslim that he is, and he was crucified for it, because he didn't know what the **** he was talking about. As usual he was trying to be clever and it backfired on him because he's so dumb he can't even act clever. Now we've got dumb sycophant ****s like you and dumbcuntkong on here doing the same dumb **** trying to play the "oh but he was taken out of context" and "are you implying the US haven't done ****ed up things in the Middle East" and so on. When was the last time Mundine was in the Middle East to be able to form an opinion on such matters?
that comment was actually directed at raff definitely not u who has yet to prove anything other then ur immense jealousy of the man.
he was insensitive true and timing could definitely been better one way or another america did fuk up. he is a muslim, wat have u done that makes anything u say valid on the matter.
America ****ed up? Thousands of innocent people from 90 different countries did nothing more than turn up for work only to be slaughtered, and the best you can offer is America ****ed up? 11 ****ing Australians died that day mate.
plus if u not disputing the fact that he wasnt directing that msg to the ppl in the towers wat is ur argument. that his timing was wrong?