List your top ten of the last forty years.

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by cuchulain, Sep 30, 2011.


  1. Vanboxingfan

    Vanboxingfan Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,591
    255
    Feb 5, 2005

    Hey my apologies, I must be going blind :patsch

    anyway, good on ya for getting Holyfield on that list..he deserves it.
     
  2. redrooster

    redrooster Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,635
    332
    Jan 29, 2005
    or it's becuz you cant give a reason and prefer not to give yourself away. Since that's the case I can see why you came up with the list you have
     
  3. redrooster

    redrooster Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,635
    332
    Jan 29, 2005
    You're the one who put Roy Jones at 10. very sad
     
  4. the cobra

    the cobra Awesomeizationism! Full Member

    12,028
    106
    Jun 30, 2008
    Indeed he does. Screw all these other guys for not having him on their list, especially redrooster.
     
  5. Bromosexual

    Bromosexual Guest

    1. Roberto Duran
    2. Ray Leonard
    3. Pernell Whitaker
    4. Muhammad Ali (would've been higher but his prime was in the 60's)
    5. Carlos Monzon
    6. Marvin Hagler
    7. Roy Jones Jr.
    8. Alexis Arguello
    9. Jose Napoles (see Ali)
    10. Thomas Hearns

    HM: Julio Cesar Chavez, Michael Spinks, Wilfredo Gomez, etc.

    No chance of a mention: Evander Holyfield, etc.
     
  6. Bromosexual

    Bromosexual Guest

    Sorry, that was my brother's account. I forgot to sign out of it. This is El Bujia.
     
  7. Brian Zelley

    Brian Zelley Active Member Full Member

    640
    3
    Feb 24, 2006
    Let's not forget BOB FOSTER and EDER JOFRE

    Before he won the featherweight title, I rated Eder Jofre
    as the best Bantamweight. After he defeated the likes
    of Jose Legre and Vincente Saldivar, I put him in the
    top ten p4p of all time. Thus, to leave Jofre out of the
    top ten of those that fought after 1969 would be a
    serious miscarriage of justice.

    Bob Foster's light-heavyweight reign as a champion
    speaks for itself.

    I enjoyed watching Ali in the Sixties and Seventies, he may have been
    great for many reasons, but I would not rank him in the top ten p4p
    for many reasons. GREAT does not = BEST in my boxing math equation.

    By any logical analysis Ali was at his best in the Sixties but come 1967
    after defeating over-the-hill Zora Folley, Ali was stripped of the title,
    The Ali that fought Chuvalo in 1972 was only a shadow of the Ali that
    fought George in 1966, but he was still exciting to watch. The big problem with that 1972 fight was to catch on to the tactic of laying against the ropes and blocking shots with his gloves, arms, body and head. It may have earned him the title with Foreman, but in the long run his version called the ROPE-A-DOPE slowly destroyed him and we got him winning a gift decision against Jimmy YOUNG and being thumped by LEON SPINKS who had limited pro experience. Throw in the broken jaw thanks to KEN NORTON and you do not have one of the top ten fighters from 1970 to 2011.
     
  8. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล Full Member

    82,426
    1,469
    Sep 7, 2008
    Jofres best work was in the 60s, which makes him ineligible for this thread.

    I rate Lennox over Evander. And I can't have Lennox in my top 40 I'm afraid (used to have Evander in the 31-35 bracket, but see no worth in Cruiserweight achievements)
     
  9. horst

    horst Guest

    :patsch

    Leonard's 4 best wins: Hearns, Hagler, Duran, Benitez

    Camacho's 4 best wins: Limon, Ramirez, Rosario, Mancini

    Tyson's 4 best wins: Spinks, Holmes, Berbick, Tucker

    Next. :dead:lol:
     
  10. horst

    horst Guest

    No he don't.
     
  11. horst

    horst Guest

    All 9 of the people I've placed above Roy have a better resume than him as I see it.

     
  12. Jear

    Jear Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,720
    12
    Jul 27, 2004
    Surprised not to have seen Ricardo Lopez mentioned
     
  13. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล Full Member

    82,426
    1,469
    Sep 7, 2008
    :lol:
     
  14. redrooster

    redrooster Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,635
    332
    Jan 29, 2005
    so what? My man Hector knocked Leonard out!

    The Hagler fight was inconclusive whether you want to admit it or not so we have to throw that out. I'm not just going to give it to him becuz his fans insist upon it.

    I never thought much of Benitez anyways and Hearns at the time only had 3 defenses to his credit. not the stuff of legends. Duran came up two weight classes and still had to drop 40+ pounds. Big deal

    on the surface they sound great but in reality there's really not much there. No Micheal Nunn, Pryor or Curry. Good fighter tho

    Camacho on the other hand was the peersonifcation of speed. Camacho would come to be what Roy Jones would later become to the sport of boxing and much more dominant than Leonard

    better chin, better defense, better footwork, quicker hands, not to mention he bested Leonard himself in battle where it counts.

    I know you dont like to acknowledge it so you dont count it, but the fact is, Camacho was every bit the washed up fighter Ray was, and was competing with a much bigger man and he still knocked him out. Hector didnt beat Ray leonard, he knocked him out and he did it becuz he had more inside where it counts

    none of this "split decision" nonsense or running from opponents like ray Leonard. hector actually ran AT him!

    And Tyson, Mike carried the sport from the mid 80s on. Mike was already prime time from the Jesse Fergueson fight on

    fact is, Tyson WAS boxing and on the tongue of every sports fan as well as boxing fan. was there anyone on the planet that didnt know the name of Tyson?
     
  15. horst

    horst Guest

    One question first before I even begin to look at any number of the horrendous statements made in your post:

    Are you serious? Really? :think