At WW: Margo ... title fights: 10-0-2, 8KO, 1NC wins over: Cintron 2x, Clottley, Cotto lost to: Willimas, Mosley Floyd ... title fights: 4-0-0, 2KO wins over: Judah, Baldomir, Hatton, Ortiz without title: Mosley, Marquez Who takes it?
Margarito has faced the tougher opposition at 147 no doubt. Margo even now would be a nightmare for Floyd. Floyd best tactics - Go on holiday , let the best beat each other up then fight then winner and say you would have beaten them all. That logic works for the *****'s , but not the rest of us.
When was Floyd undisputed anything???? Through all weight divisions Floyd has been ranked number 1 at 130 , 135 but never been undisputed. Infact he went on holiday to ensure that never happend.
Because that you post assume being linear or undisputed, automatically, is better then anything else. Not in today's boxing world where business takes a front seat to the sport. Too many politics involved now. But you aren't looking at anything but that ONE thing, as if that's the only deciding factor. Who who has defeated more ring ranked WW's? (That would be Margo. Not just something to dismiss). Was Floyd undisaputed? Yes. Did he unify anything? Nope, just won one fight to get that distinction. It would be another if HE was the one to unify, but for some reason, Floyd wasn't one to unify belts. Margarito has longevity, has more wins over ring ranked WW's, and if we look at single bvest wins, I'd say his win over Cotto is better then Floyd's best win at WW, which is over Mosley and his long ass lay off. Sorry about the 'stupid' commenbt BTW.
Resume wise . Def Margarito , Hes fought every welterweight threat there was so far . Everyone from undefeated Paul Williams (At the time) to number 1 p4p Manny Pacquiao .
Undisputed = undisputed champion of a division. For people who rag on belts all the time you sure like to bring them up to suit your agenda. I guess Hopkins wasn't undisputed until he won that WBO belt, huh?