The "All Things Mayweather/Pacquiao" Express!!!!!!

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by IntentionalButt, May 30, 2008.


Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. CoDer

    CoDer Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,914
    0
    Nov 14, 2010
    No. You're the one who's missing the point.

    $10M penalty over 147 is practically moot and academic, since you will never go over it anyway.

    Do they have a basis for asking such idiotic demand? Yes they have.
     
  2. Divi253

    Divi253 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,939
    4
    Apr 1, 2010
    I believe I asked you back then to show me where you believe you saw an article or interview or ANYTHING that states it would be an EASY or QUICK process for Floyd to petition the commission.. Nothing about that sounds fast or easy.. but you know what is, just agreeing! But you can't admit that I know.

    Lol wait... So Pac's 10 mil penalty is to insure Floyd comes into the fight at 147 or below and insurance that he's paid 10 million instead of having to cancel the fight?

    So wouldn't Floyd's blood testing be to insure Pac comes into the fight clean and he doesn't receive a L on his record if he loses to a dirty fighter? Because if Pac takes the regular tests and beats Floyd, then it comes out later he was dirty, they won't change the L on his record correct?
     
  3. Lance_Uppercut

    Lance_Uppercut ESKIMO Full Member

    51,943
    2
    Jul 19, 2004
    And you're a lying *****. Which is proven as fact. So that means this post is pretty questionable too. :yep

    "You're just a hater"...jesus...get some ****in new material :patsch:
     
  4. mrjotatp4p

    mrjotatp4p THE ONE Full Member

    15,571
    8
    Feb 5, 2010
    :deal They damn sure didn't change the L on Oscar's record after Mosley turned out to be dirty.
     
  5. Divi253

    Divi253 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,939
    4
    Apr 1, 2010
    Yes, in between working and boxing news. :lol: Don't mind that. So why the weight penalty?

    So why the weight penalty?

    Not saying he did... I'm asking why anyone would believe he won't make 147 since you believe they are justified in asking for the weight penalty although commission already has something in place for it.
     
  6. mrjotatp4p

    mrjotatp4p THE ONE Full Member

    15,571
    8
    Feb 5, 2010
    Lance you are the one who said you went to a gym for one day and it was too hard and wore you out and you never went back. After I called you out on it you said that it was just a free try out bc you already had a gym membership at another gym. **** out of here woman. Are you hater of Floyd?
     
  7. Lance_Uppercut

    Lance_Uppercut ESKIMO Full Member

    51,943
    2
    Jul 19, 2004

    I know. And if I recall, I didn't feel the need to produce something that people already discussed here on ESB. There's no point in me having to prove to you Kizer said that. It's been a topic here, and at the end of the say, you can shoose to not believe me, if it helps your case.

    As for the rest of your post, I'm tired of running in circles. All that conjecture you post in the last paragraph, some of those pointless question, really don't mean anything.
     
  8. Divi253

    Divi253 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,939
    4
    Apr 1, 2010
    And they won't.. And everyone here knows how Floyd cares about his record.. but lets not use logic and try to figure out why he asked for the tests, easier to just say he's a psychic and KNEW Pac would freak about testing. Even though they initially said it was no issue.
     
  9. mrjotatp4p

    mrjotatp4p THE ONE Full Member

    15,571
    8
    Feb 5, 2010
    Way to ***** out Lance. :good
     
  10. KnuckleUp99

    KnuckleUp99 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,055
    1
    Jan 15, 2011
    "asking"?? No..... Floyd accused Pac without grounds to support those damaging accusations...then decided to "make the situation better" by then DEMANDING Pac take FSDT in a very interesting way to somehow get this "easy payday" in the ring to prove that he can whoop the little midget. :roll: Sorry bro but nothing Floyd has said or done has made sense when it comes to making the fight with Manny.... He's done a good job on sabotaging the whole thing...
     
  11. Divi253

    Divi253 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,939
    4
    Apr 1, 2010
    far from about helping my case... Everything I write about I've seen written online in an interview or heard from a video interview... and everytime I've been asked to produce a source for my thinking I produce one.. because I can.. .because I know what I'm saying I've looked into myself before posting. But I'm sure I said this last time... You claim you saw it... Won't call you a liar, but I'm not buying **** until I see it for myself.
     
  12. Lance_Uppercut

    Lance_Uppercut ESKIMO Full Member

    51,943
    2
    Jul 19, 2004
    :patsch I said it was HARD you dumb ****in iliterate. And it is hard you ***. I also said it was a FREE ONE DAY trial thing, which it was. PLaces like that often do that ****, as a way to get people to join. And yes, I have a current gym membership and not about to pay for two. Still with me ****?

    Oh nevermind, you're just a ***** ass liar anyway... Go kick Bald Bull's ass dude! You can be the champ! :thumbsup
     
  13. mrjotatp4p

    mrjotatp4p THE ONE Full Member

    15,571
    8
    Feb 5, 2010
    Well Team Pacquiao agreed to it and then backed out. Contradicted themselves several times. Got caught lying several times and yet Floyd is the only one sabotaging the fight. I blame them all.
     
  14. Lance_Uppercut

    Lance_Uppercut ESKIMO Full Member

    51,943
    2
    Jul 19, 2004

    :patsch Jesus christs... I guess I imagined Kizer saying that, I imagined people talking about it, even other floyd fans on this site.
     
  15. mrjotatp4p

    mrjotatp4p THE ONE Full Member

    15,571
    8
    Feb 5, 2010
    No you said it was one day pass after I called your ***** ass out. You sure do mention Punch Out a lot. Sounds like you are the one playing it. :lol:
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.