Why are many ATG lists including boxers who I know many of you have never seen live?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by jasper222, Oct 6, 2011.


  1. jasper222

    jasper222 Member Full Member

    106
    0
    Nov 13, 2010
    For instance (this isn't mine):

    SRR
    Ali
    Louis
    Pep
    Greb
    Armstrong
    Duran
    Langford
    Benny Leonard
    Dempsey
    SRL
    Moore
    Monzon
    Charles
    Fitzsimmons


    Don't tell me you've seen these fighters (in bold) live. What right do you have to put them on your ATG lists if you've never seen them fight? Hearsay? I'd rather believe people who'd put say, De La Hoya in their ATG lists. They're more believable since he has records, tangible ones at that, and people in this era know him. :-(

    But then again, why is it that many posters lambast others for putting people like Oscar in their ATG lists? Their lists have more credibility since these posters in this era have actually seen these guys fight.

    This is terrible. I thought this site had credible posters but I guess I was wrong. :roll:
     
  2. SouthpawJab

    SouthpawJab On his way up!! 4-0!! Full Member

    8,781
    20
    May 26, 2011
    I understand giving respect to fighters of the past, but some of these are ridiculous.
     
  3. bobotnaman

    bobotnaman ★★★★☆ Full Member

    3,884
    1
    Sep 8, 2011
    there's a thing called youtube and replay. and old articles. although i kinda agree with you that's why i don't have a top 10 list because i haven't seen (or followed) 70s and older era fighters. i've only seen them on tv (greatest fights).
     
  4. SportsLeader

    SportsLeader Chilling Full Member

    9,226
    5
    May 29, 2010
  5. jasper222

    jasper222 Member Full Member

    106
    0
    Nov 13, 2010
    I know hence I didn't count Ali and the others.
     
  6. KO-KING

    KO-KING Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,539
    9
    Feb 15, 2011
    old footage, but some fighters don't even have those
     
  7. cesare-borgia

    cesare-borgia Übermensch in fieri Full Member

    28,924
    20
    Jul 4, 2009
    he has a point though, how can someone say greb would beat roy jones when there is no footage at all.
     
  8. Davew430

    Davew430 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,392
    1
    Jan 30, 2009
    There's barely any footage on the likes of Greb and Langford, but all you have to do is look at their records, what they've achieved and under the circumstance's they achieved it all under, then you realise why they're ATG's
     
  9. Davew430

    Davew430 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,392
    1
    Jan 30, 2009

    No, that's H2H fantasy match up's.

    Nobody is saying Greb would beat Roy Jones...

    When analyising an ATG fighter, me personally take 3 thing's into account...

    Skillset
    Resume
    Achievements (multiple weights, etc)

    Now look at Greb's record and achievements and tell me that doesn't not only outweigh, but completley smash what Jones has done?
     
  10. the cobra

    the cobra Awesomeizationism! Full Member

    12,028
    106
    Jun 30, 2008
    Oh, General Forum.
     
  11. jasper222

    jasper222 Member Full Member

    106
    0
    Nov 13, 2010
    Then again, haven't you realized it? Promoters in the past are similar to promoters in the present, and writers/authors in the past are similar to now. What makes you think they haven't put a personal touch of their own, aka an exaggeration?

    I mean, I've seen some Armstrong and Dempsey on the net. I really think even Hatton could beat them. Sure their accomplishments were great, but it was great FOR THEIR TIME. Forgive me for saying this, but Dempsey's style is food for fighters like Nonito Donaire or Floyd.
     
  12. Davew430

    Davew430 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,392
    1
    Jan 30, 2009
    But they fought for 15 rounds, maybe more in outdoor stadiums in 100degree + heat.

    They fought every 2 weeks, also beat other great fighter's of their generation.
     
  13. Bogotazo

    Bogotazo Amateur Full Member

    31,381
    1,133
    Oct 17, 2009
    Most people honest enough in their efforts to make a comprehensive ATG list take the time to use whatever resources available to contextualize the era and the level of competition faced by these fighters. Footage helps, and combined with personal accounts and journalistic sources, we get some idea. Some accomplishments speak for themselves regardless (Greb's for example) and allow these fighters to shine despite us never having seen them. It's problematic, but it's all subjective to a large extent anyways.
     
  14. jasper222

    jasper222 Member Full Member

    106
    0
    Nov 13, 2010
    I know boxing in the past was more physically and mentally taxing than today's boxing. However, that doesn't take away from the fact that some modern boxers can match or even surpass those fighters even in very different conditions.

    If that's the case, then why isn't Sullivan on the ATG lists? He was the first heavyweight champ of the world after all, and he fought bare-knuckle.

    See how it stacks up? I know where you come from though. It's just that some people are hypocrites for putting people they've never seen in their ATG lists and calling others out for putting fighters they've seen in their lists.
     
  15. Davew430

    Davew430 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,392
    1
    Jan 30, 2009

    That's pretty much bang on the button.

    I understand your point of view Jasper, but their accomplishment's speak for themselves in most cases, you don't need to see footage.

    If we we're doing fantasy head 2 head matches, then it'd be difficult to argue for the fighter who's footage we have not seen, but when debating their ATG standing, there's more than enough sources/accounts/etc to rank them