khan is fast becoming a fraud again

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by IRONSENSE2002, Oct 7, 2011.


  1. THE ENFORCER

    THE ENFORCER Smash Your Pasty Full Member

    450
    0
    Jun 26, 2011
    paul mclosky!!!....should have fought hatton instead of mclosky...pointless fight....

    both pointless fights......no disrespect magic matt.
     
  2. Lazarus

    Lazarus Realist Full Member

    29,937
    1
    Jan 1, 2010
    Ironsense on Bradley fighting Casamayor:

     
  3. THE ENFORCER

    THE ENFORCER Smash Your Pasty Full Member

    450
    0
    Jun 26, 2011
    x2 :good
     
  4. mani0

    mani0 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,060
    0
    Sep 29, 2009
    No he needs to beat the ghost of Casamayor or wait some one else has beat him to it.

    How about Castillo is he suitable
     
  5. mani0

    mani0 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,060
    0
    Sep 29, 2009
    :lol:
     
  6. Uncle Rico

    Uncle Rico Loyal Member Full Member

    39,748
    3
    Jun 28, 2009
    Whether you agree with it or not, Khan has already earned the Mayweather payday. Providing he wins his next few fights - even if they're against bums - the Mayweather showdown has been more or less written in stone.

    And based on current achievements, Brook is on the same level as Matt. SO fighting Matt instead of him, really isn't that big of a deal. In fact, it's probably the more sensible option. He garners much more attention because of his brother, and he'll be easy to negotiate a deal with. Whereas Brook - promoted by Hearn - will ask for a bigger piece of the pie.
     
  7. Uncle Rico

    Uncle Rico Loyal Member Full Member

    39,748
    3
    Jun 28, 2009
    :good
     
  8. Thomas!!

    Thomas!! Guest

    Kahn aint no fraud, fool
     
  9. The Milkman

    The Milkman Cos i always deliver Full Member

    408
    0
    Oct 1, 2011
    earn the right to fight Floyd? going by that logic Khan should lose a fight and then look shaky so Floyd knows it's a safe enough fight to win.
     
  10. Lazarus

    Lazarus Realist Full Member

    29,937
    1
    Jan 1, 2010
    To be honest, Matthew Hatton is no better than Khan fighting Paul McCloskey, so people shouldn't be so against it.

    Hatton's been European champ and went the distance with Saul Alvarez, and tbf, didn't look like he got absolutely dominated.

    I wouldn't mind it if it was his debut. The fight with Kell wouldn't happen anyway, as Amir's team don't want to deal with Matchroom and Hearn wants Brook to have a world title before he fights Amir so it won't and can't be Brook for his debut.
     
  11. THE ENFORCER

    THE ENFORCER Smash Your Pasty Full Member

    450
    0
    Jun 26, 2011
    i think its the kind of things like one team not wanting to work with another team that turns many people away from boxing......its kids tricks imo, pointless.....they might not get on with one promoter or someone on the team but fights make money and so do the teams.........i just wish all this bull**** would make its way out of boxing.......i mean they are grown men, not kids in the playground!:deal

    i dunno! :lol:
     
  12. mani0

    mani0 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,060
    0
    Sep 29, 2009
    Khan should fight the WBA champ that would be a better more meaningful fight.
     
  13. IRONSENSE2002

    IRONSENSE2002 muslim and proud Full Member

    5,383
    1
    Jul 27, 2010
    yeah meanigful in the sense that hes the weakest title holder in the division,:think
     
  14. mani0

    mani0 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,060
    0
    Sep 29, 2009
    He is better than a 40 yr old Casamayor and would be a better fight than Hatton and Brook.
     
  15. widdy

    widdy lancs,where real men live Full Member

    5,747
    0
    Aug 19, 2008
    your right laz,he was lucky not to get the win,hometown verdict it ever i seen one:lol: