Was Morales vs Pacquiao 3 pointless?

Pac fans still butt hurt that raheem beat morales before pac ever did.

 

Morales has had a lot of time to heal up, now he back with his second wind, unfortunately he still lost to maidana.

 

everyone can really ignore the fact that morales has done well on his return against maidana the reason morales last 4 fights ended so bad for him his weight its that simple he wasnt dedicated anymore to keeping the weight down between fights and he was dead once he was in the ring anybody who couldnt see that must of been watching something different i never seen morales properly hurt in the fight i just seen a morales with no legs left cause making weight took everything out of him

 

Raheem had already lost to Popo by that time. The 3rd fight was not pointless as it was a rubbermatch that would determine a winner in the trilogy and establish in the ring who is the better fighter.

 

to answer your question....

before the fight - no
after the fight - it seemed so

 

All it established was how done morales was at the time.

 

there are excuses on both sides of the fence. At the end of the day Pac won the trilogy.

 

in hindsight, yes

people love talking in hindsight

 

I never knew that

 

well now you know.

 

ofcourse it was pointless, but this is chicken manny were talking about..

fighting past it fighters sadly is what pacroid is all about

 

have some

This content is protected

 

No, it was well worth it to see Morales quit and his fanboys cry about how "sad" it was :rofl.

 

[yt]DccGq-M6iMI[/yt]

 

are you even aware that the morales' camp only has the option for the rematch?