I think not. Having a winning record means nothing if you haven´t fought anyone. Beck has fought some top comp and although he´s lost to most he was at least ranked and tested. Two fights ago Szpilka took on Hadziaganovic who was 8-0, but so what...the guy didn´t fight anyone of consequence. Its the same thing.
Nah, Furys fights are boring and let us not forget Adameks all time great wars against McBride and Grant. :rofl
He´s funny, in the sense that we all laugh at him. So he brings us a sort of entertainment, I´ll give him that.
Shouldn't you be cleaning some brits car or attend some meat stealing operation at a supermarket? Typical polish glass gimp.
I agree zeller had a padded record but he had a lot of experience, a lot of wins and was a good test for a second fight. While beck is coming in on a row of ko losses, is shot and with no confidence. And that's on arturs 8th fight. And to be honest I think the two fighters are very comparable in ability at this point of becks career. All I'm saying is that it's not spectacular for artur to fight beck at this point- although it's still a good fight- and that hyping him while taking a dump on fury makes no sense.
Its nice to see things in perspective. The reality is Beck would not be a good opponent for someone who´s 20-0 and is considering a title shot, but he´s quite a good opponent for someone as green as Szpilka.
i think the kid is the real deal. yeah, it is still early but if u watch his early fights u could see the potential in the kid. i expect big things from him in the future
Yes, I can agree to that.Never claimed Beck was a spectacular opponent for Szpilka (on the order of let´s say....Povetkin taking on Chambers at 15 wins) but that he´s a pretty good opponent and a bit of a surprise considering 1. this was just a TBA that was announced at the last moment and the fight is this Saturday and that 2. Szpilka will fight 3 weeks later.