your boxing statements that people will find controversial?

Hearns is a greater fighter then Duran. Hearns H2H would beat Leonard 9 outta 10 times.


Margarito and Cotto were Top Rank hype jobs who struggled with average opposition before Arum started feeding them stiffs.

Kessler is at best a B level fighter.

 

The 168 division is overrated because of the Super Six hype.

 

I dont think those are controversial, those are all true.

 

Hoopkins is top 10 ATG.

 

Pakow scard of reel pilipine champon Torrecampo. Torrecampo reel man.

 

Lucian Bute will kick everyone's ass at SMW and LHW. He's a top 10 P4P and will be the linear SMW Champion of the world with all the belts.

 

i actually HATE floyd mayweather just respect his talent.
What was messed up in my logic?

 

I agree with all of those except the last one

 

-floyd and pac are underrated compared to legends of the past.
- pw isnt shot southpaws just give him problems
- wlad beats 70's ali
- dempsey is overrated
- roy jones is unfairly critisized for his past prime losses compared to other greats.
- bernard hopkins has one of the highest ring iq's ever.
- mark breland would have had a great shot at beating floyd
- prince hameds skills are underrated
- marquez is on the same level as barrera and morales
- canelo is ko waiting to happen
- mike jones will be the one to beat pac in 2013
- ortiz would stop khan
- vitali easily beats foreman
- ray leonard playing hagler is overlooked when ranking him
- roy jones would monzon at 160
- Pac is top 3 southpaw ever
- prime tyson would give everyone in heavyweight history atleast a tough fight.

 

..........'When controversial borders with plain wrong'........

 

"Mayweather is a top 5 P4P of all time"
" pacquiao didnt really win 8 titles in 8 divsions"