Nothing happens when it happens on Sky it's going to be brushed under the rug and the rug nailed down on ****ing Boxnation.
Im sure hes done this many times ... Someone needs to dig up some scorecards that hes given in big fights over the last few years that where totally different to the other 2 judges.
If there is a lot of close rounds a judge can legitimatley score them all to one fighter, -this is boxing and this is why there is multiple judges- stop whining
Its the facyt that all these decsions that are wildly out of kilter with common sense are all in favour of the promoter's favourite fighter.
DeGale "winning" earlier was worse but yeah 117-112 is definitely a little too wide. Means he only gave Bellew 3 rounds outright atsch
How many times has it been said, the board turn a blind eye to this bull****. The same cliche of officials are on every show. Total bull****.
Well most seem to disagree with me and I've no problem admitting if I got it wrong so I'll rewatch some time tomorrow and see but this is how I scored it: 1 - Wilczeswki 2 - DeGale 3 - Wilczeswki 4 - Wilczeswki 5 - Wilczeswki 6 - DeGale 7 - Wilczeswki 8 - Wilczewski 9 - DeGale 10- Wilczewski 11- Wilczewski 12- DeGale 116-112 Wilczewski Most people seemed to give it to James DeGale just because he's James DeGale from what I can see. The commentary was perhaps the most biased I have ever heard. One of the rounds DeGale spent at least 2 minutes against the ropes and yet John Rawling said during the round "DeGale is leaving nothing in the tank" There were several other times DeGale got caught with 2 or 3 good, solid punches that had no mention from the commentary. Wilczewski then naturally held on a little and DeGale slapped back only for John Rawling to go into full ball licking mode claiming Wilczewski was "in trouble" I'll rewatch and make a thread about it tomorrow :good
Paris is a Joke as soon as they said his name I was waiting for a stupid score and sure enough he didnt disapoint. Cleverly won by 2-3 Rounds 5 Never.