Am I the only one who thinks Chad Dawson should have been disqualified?

I mean seriously that spinebuster he put on Hopkins was illegal as ****!

 

hard to say cause

1) Dawson's foul was a response to a foul from Hopkins (though I think Dawson did bend below the waist which is illegal)

2) We don't know if Hopkins was just acting it out.

 

Nah, it didn't look that serious in realtime. NC if anything.

BHop's just old. If he were 20 years younger he woulda shook it off.

 

Hopkins is a joke

 

:good

The right way. Chambers fould Wlad and nobody here on ESB was claiming

Foul, Foul, than it was "Wlad´s fault"!!! It you lean on the back of your opponent, it can happen that your opponent reacts like that. Wladimir was not claiming anything, he was continuiing fighting, but Wlad was hurt after this attack from Chambers! Wlad was not acting, recovering and knock Chambers out.

This content is protected

 

For what? Hopkins tried to pull some bully **** on Dawson, and Dawson wasn't having it, so BHOP took the ***** way out. This wasn't Pascal he was in the ring with, and he knew he was about to get ****ed up, that was seriously disgusting, and Dawson getting DQ'd would have been a travesty.

 

dawson did everything 100% right. hopkins was doing his streetfighting **** like when he pushed chad and kept hitting him. bhop was leaning and chad threw him off, theres nothing wrong with that. then bhop does his acting. i gained so much respect for chad when he called hopkins a ***** in the middle of the ring. i was so happy when it was announced a tko instead of a no contest.

 

no, chad did wat he was supposed to do. Bernard jumped on his back, he (Chad) shoulder'd him on some '***** get off me' type ****

 

He did shake off a bodyslam in echols 2:deal

 

hopkins is a *****

 

why the **** does one foul justify another foul? you can't just slam fighters like that.

 

I wish it was a NC but I think hopkins was faking

 

I do not justify it.

Both times it was a foul. But both times the boxer leaned on the back of the opponent.

In my opinion this fight (Hopkins vs. Dawson) should by NC.

I dislike the behavior from Hopkns. Hopkins uses "dirty tactics" so he should not crying like a baby when another fighter uses "dirty" tactics. He uses his had in the first round to hurt Dawson!

 

Yes, he should have been dq'ed, that was ****ing disgraceful.

 

Hopkins did it once before where he pushed Dawson down, the second time Dawson got pissed and just threw him off his shoulder.