Better Mayweather win: Marquez or Ortiz?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by CocoonOfHorror!, Oct 18, 2011.

  1. horst

    horst Guest

    Nope, Marquez weighed in at 142. Google it. You're wrong.
     
  2. mancat

    mancat Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2007
    Messages:
    3,511
    Likes Received:
    1
    Mayweather wooped Marquez so bad, Marquez was saying he thought Mayweather out weighed him by 20 pounds. :patsch And idiots on this forum were saying Mayweather weighed about 160. Hate is blinding.
     
  3. horst

    horst Guest

    Don't argue with me, argue with The Ring magazine which published these figures. :good
     
  4. mancat

    mancat Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2007
    Messages:
    3,511
    Likes Received:
    1
    Sorry, my bad, but your overall point is wrong. Marquez weighed closer to 150 than 140. And Mayweather did NOT weigh 152. The victory was predicated on skill not size. As was Mayweather's victory over Ortiz who outweighed Mayweather 164 to 150 the night of the fight.
     
  5. MichiganWarrior

    MichiganWarrior Still Slick! Still Black! Full Member

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2010
    Messages:
    26,793
    Likes Received:
    7
    Lol and alot of people bought into it. Little ass Mayweather who's never gone above 150 in his career weighed 160 against Marquez. :patsch
     
  6. BigReg

    BigReg Broad Street Bully Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2007
    Messages:
    38,117
    Likes Received:
    5
    Where did they get their info from considering Mayweather refused to be weighed?
     
  7. horst

    horst Guest

    I repeat:

    Don't argue with me, argue with The Ring magazine who published the figures. :good
     
  8. Uncle Rico

    Uncle Rico Loyal Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2009
    Messages:
    39,748
    Likes Received:
    3
    The f*ck you on about? Why did The Ring magazine report this? How did they get this information? Why are you reporting it on here? Both of you are full of ****!

    :)good)
     
  9. horst

    horst Guest

    It was in the magazine. I noted it. I am reporting it. All I am is passing on published info. I have no idea why this upsets people, none.
     
  10. Uncle Rico

    Uncle Rico Loyal Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2009
    Messages:
    39,748
    Likes Received:
    3
    Just messin'
     
  11. horst

    horst Guest

    People do get upset though. You can see it on this thread already!
     
  12. Uncle Rico

    Uncle Rico Loyal Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2009
    Messages:
    39,748
    Likes Received:
    3
    Lol yeah I know. I remember the reaction when you first mentioned it in another thread.
     
  13. CocoonOfHorror!

    CocoonOfHorror! LONG-TIME LURKER! Full Member

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2011
    Messages:
    339
    Likes Received:
    0
    Hey Popkins NO OFFENSE, man. I'm just curious. Was it on their site or their magazine? Is there a link or anything? I'd like to get to the bottom of it so everybody doesn't have to fight about it. I'm glad you commented because you always seem to know what you're talking about! I respect your opinion and info. :good
     
  14. BigReg

    BigReg Broad Street Bully Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2007
    Messages:
    38,117
    Likes Received:
    5
    It doesn't matter who published it. In this case, they are not a reliable source.
     
  15. horst

    horst Guest

    It was in the magazine. I didn't keep it because I didn't realize no-one else would've read it, and certainly didn't realize it would continually cause such sobbing, weeping and crying amongst *****sexuals, but I did keep note of the figures for an article I was planning to write. Someone out there must have that edition and can verify that The Ring clearly stated that these were their fightnight weights!!