Great Britain vs. Poland - A history of dominance

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Jack, Oct 16, 2011.


  1. GladiatoR

    GladiatoR Guest

    Why do you keep calling me a darky? You're a racist **** and how dare you suggest I use the same language you do.

    As I have pointed out many a time before, earlier in this thread some Polaks were basically saying ' you cannot be black & British '.

    How many more times do we have to go over this?
     
  2. VanillaKilla

    VanillaKilla Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,611
    1
    Oct 31, 2008
    British blood means of English,Scottish,Welsh,North Irish, Manx ect.... ancestry

    Do you agree, that these are accurate descriptions of the inhabitants of Britain?
     
  3. VanillaKilla

    VanillaKilla Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,611
    1
    Oct 31, 2008
    I guess you are not aware that "darky" and "polak" are the same thing. Racial epithets. Using either makes you a racist :-(
     
  4. GladiatoR

    GladiatoR Guest

    Well I wouldn't agree with 5.

    Foreign British e.g from Romania who lives here but has no citizenship?
     
  5. PolishPummler

    PolishPummler Obsessed with Boxing banned

    19,752
    4
    Oct 15, 2005
    The Native British man is soft:deal
     
  6. Stinky gloves

    Stinky gloves Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,255
    14
    May 31, 2007
    ask your dear buddy Jack ... he is using the therm '******s' - I assume it is
    politically correct in Britain to call people '******' instead e.g. Jamiacan.

    What I see Poles never argued about blacks not being British ...
    I guess reading English wasn't strong in your school.

    They were saying something that black people in your country
    are not ethnically British, not that they are not British at all.
     
  7. GladiatoR

    GladiatoR Guest

    But isn't Polka used for Polish women?

    I do not use it as a derogatory word.

    Notice how I say Polak and not Polack?
     
  8. VanillaKilla

    VanillaKilla Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,611
    1
    Oct 31, 2008
    Yes 5 would be a romanian,french,polish,indian, ect.... that lives in UK without a citizenship.....

    my question from the beginning was that....

    Why are there so few good boxers from 1, but so many from 2 and 3?

    Just a question mate :good

    Nothing racist here, just a question
     
  9. GladiatoR

    GladiatoR Guest

    Jack can use it as he's black, but you can't use it!

    You didn't see ****, 'cause you didn't look hard enough. We've been going 'round in circles for a while now, it's in there somewhere.
     
  10. Stinky gloves

    Stinky gloves Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,255
    14
    May 31, 2007
    Jack is black ... really ... and he can use the therm
    '******' for example to describe Indians or Bengalis?

    Why is that white people in your country cannot use the therm
    black to describe Jack or '******' for Bengali but Jack can?
     
  11. GladiatoR

    GladiatoR Guest

    Apart from Hatton, Selkirk, Groves, Barker.

    Who else falls into the first category?

    I take it the likes of Gavin & Macklin are exempt?
     
  12. VanillaKilla

    VanillaKilla Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,611
    1
    Oct 31, 2008
    Polak in the English language is a racial epithet

    The proper term is "Polish" man or woman

    Ask yourself, Is the term N***a a racist term? Blacks call themselves this, is it Ok for you to use?
     
  13. GladiatoR

    GladiatoR Guest

    Yeah, **** only ever goes down when white people use that term.
     
  14. GladiatoR

    GladiatoR Guest

    Polack in the English language is a racial remark, is Polak?

    Polack being the Anglicisation of the word Polak.
     
  15. Arran

    Arran Boxing Junkie banned

    9,773
    3
    Jan 21, 2008
    didnt seem so soft in ww2...unlike poland who laid down and took it like a *****