Bruce Woodcock v David Haye

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Unforgiven, Oct 17, 2011.


  1. lora

    lora Fighting Zapata Full Member

    10,305
    547
    Feb 17, 2010

    Other than perhaps power for a cruiser, i saw none of those things when watching Haye.

    the man was a ponderous unskilled labourer with telegraphed looping right hand and a sloppy easily penetrable reflexive defense.


    Woodcock wasn't a good fighter either though, so who knows who would win.
     
  2. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,748
    21,584
    Nov 24, 2005
    We still don't produce as many men (of any size) as America.
    They have a population over 5 times as large as us.

    I think historically we made a far bigger impact at middleweight.
     
  3. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,748
    21,584
    Nov 24, 2005
    Bull****.
    He throws A LOT of sloppy wild reckless punches that would make Luis Firpo jealous. :good
     
  4. TheGreatA

    TheGreatA Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,241
    157
    Mar 4, 2009
    I know you're just wanting to defend one of Wladimir Klitschko's better wins but in reality the man just wasn't that good. He blew away some usual suspects of the Euro scene and nearly embarrassed himself against the big circus act that was Nikolai Valuev with an output of 2 punches a round. If not for Valuev having fallen out of favours and having ran his course, he probably would have been jobbed like the rest, putting him in the same category as ancient Larry Donald and Holyfield.

    The only reason he might get a win here, is because Woodcock himself wasn't much of a fighter. He could still hit and that's why I wouldn't lay any money on Haye to win, a guy that was on the floor against a middleweight.
     
  5. thistle1

    thistle1 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,915
    151
    Jul 30, 2006
    Woodcock was much better than some here are thinking, look at a couple of the ealier posts!

    I understand SuzieQ, I like Haye and had faith in him, I really thought he could pull off an upset against Klit (because the Klits aren't great either), still believe he could.

    But that No Show he gave is only beaten in pathetic performance by the last 5-6 years of Hopkins!

    Woodcock's period was simply better, the times demanded it, even though the British and Euro HWs weren't great, some of them were good enough. Woodcock being one of them!
     
  6. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,748
    21,584
    Nov 24, 2005
  7. Conteh

    Conteh New Member Full Member

    36
    0
    Oct 17, 2011

    Pretty much agree with most of what you've written on this thread. Woodcock pre Joe Baski gives Haye a Carl Thomspn type of fight.

    Baski ruined ( that , that hadn't already been ruined by their respective mangers and promoters ) both Woodcock and Freddie Mills . All but blinded Woodcock permanently - and Mills told his corner that Baski was too big, too strong and simply quit there and then.
     
  8. choklab

    choklab cocoon of horror Full Member

    27,674
    7,658
    Dec 31, 2009

    yes the public and jack solomons were thirsty for making up for lost time after the war. Fights were made in a hurry, solomons wanted to strike while the iron was hot and deliver what the public wanted ASAP. It wasnt good on the careers of mills and woodcock, though woodcock and baksi posibly earned just as well as genuine champions.
     
  9. Conteh

    Conteh New Member Full Member

    36
    0
    Oct 17, 2011
    Yeah, Mills and Woodcock were pUshed from pillar to post and division to division to satisfy Solomons ( Eve of Derby shows ) and Broadcribb ( The Broadcribb and Farr fisaco after the Louis fight make good reading ) .

    Mills did well , not so sure that Woodcock did though - turned his back completely on Boxing.
     
  10. El Bujia

    El Bujia Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,744
    80
    Apr 4, 2010
    And this is the truth. The guy is a terribly sloppy finisher. Just an overrated hack in general, really.
     
  11. burt bienstock

    burt bienstock Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,285
    403
    Jan 22, 2010
    Yes C, I used to see big Joe Baksi at MSG, and at Stillman's gym training and joking around aftervtraining. A BIG,muscular product of the coal mines who reminded me of Joe Palooka of the comic strips.. was kod by Ezzard Charles in 1948. Ezzard too fast, for the burley Baksi...
     
  12. TheGreatA

    TheGreatA Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,241
    157
    Mar 4, 2009
    Baksi was very much the Chuvalo of his era, except with a tendency to cut which led to his TKO loss to Charles. He was once to challenge Joe Louis but decided to take a tune-up in Sweden against Olle Tandberg before the heavyweight title match, and got robbed. One of the all-time dumbest moves in heavyweight history, surely.
     
  13. thistle1

    thistle1 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,915
    151
    Jul 30, 2006
    then he thought about a trip back home to Poland, like the world would wait for him!

    _uck fighters with more too offer in all divisions never got a sniff of a title shot, he's in line and he casually goes on holidays - now that's a real Pollock joke.

    No malice intendented, just pure irony!
     
  14. choklab

    choklab cocoon of horror Full Member

    27,674
    7,658
    Dec 31, 2009
    jack solomons always hinted that baksi cost him a fortune because baksi did not really fancy a louis fight. joe baksi made big money in europe, solomons even got the american a private plane so baksi could visit his family in prague from london while he was under contract. a big deal for a coal miner those days.
     
  15. choklab

    choklab cocoon of horror Full Member

    27,674
    7,658
    Dec 31, 2009
    I think I read that woodcock managed peter bates, the british heavyweight who beat henry cooper, but that might have been publicity..