God, this is agony. In that case nobody has ever been floored in their prime, if their prime = when they are winning. Wlad has hit the deck what, 13 times or something? Sooo....being rocked by Briggs and Vitaly - who are hardly feather fisted (and still winning by TKO in 6 rounds or less) is WORSE than being sat on your arse 13 times? **** me. What planet are we living on?
perfect example of the reason why the word "prime" has become meaningless. misuse by ******s to further agendas. lennox was not at his best, optimum condition either time he lost. thus he was not "prime" ("a state or time of greatest strength, vigor, or success in a person's life")
THIS is an example of why Lewis chin is better than Wlads. [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RylOgj0KtqY[/ame]
Lennox fought with much more urgency than Wlad ever will. Every Wlad fight is 10 rounds or more guaranteed; even when fighting cruiserweights. Lennox was exciting enough to put on HBO and PPV. Wlad is not.
I can just replace the name Lennox with the name Wladimir and use this paragraph as my counter argument: Wladimir was not at his best, optimum condition either time he lost. thus he was not "prime" ("a state or time of greatest strength, vigor, or success in a person's life") :rofl:rofl:rofl
Once you post something like "Wlad was not KO'd or even floored in his prime" you have no argument. Ever. In any thread.
last time Wlad was floored was in 2004 when he was off balance against TOS and he was not in his prime. It was 7 years ago, and he won that fight by the way. Lewis = weak chin, both of them have weak chins. Just because you mindlessly click on buttons Lewis' chin won't get any better. W Klit was down more, but fought a lot more also(WK 59 fights and LL 42). Wlad got up from KDs to win and Lewis never did. What next, we are going to compare which character from dumb and the dumber is smarter?
Considering I've seen him knocked down by the wind of some punches, that's hardly a surprise. It's generally easier to win after being KD if you're knocked down a lot, by not very hard punches.
counter argument to what? i don't think that wlad was "prime" when he got knocked down or beat. you seem a bit stoopid. :nut
Ah, the "broken toe" excuse. Naturally, Lewis was never at his best when he lost. He made that point very clear after every losing effort. :nut
well he clearly wasn't "prime" against mccall. he was an accident waiting to happen under pepe & everyone knew it. he was clearly out of shape against rahman. he obviously didn't take that fight seriously...didn't train properly...didn't acclimatise to the conditions...anyone who had seen that fight would have spotted these things. no point trying to explain stuff like that to a ******ed nuthugger like yourself tho.
How many times has Wlad been KOd-0. Lewis-2 Lewis had better endurance/ring smarts and interior defense/grappling ability, but Wlad has the better chin.:deal
Lennox was more aggressive. He was able to take top fighters out of there in the first half of the fight. How many times have you seen Wladimir do that
I believe Klitschko is the best boxer the world has ever seen, and I'm talking about a few trillion years of history. Wlad ****s any caveman up.