Who am I to consider who the true WBA champ is? They are the ones who determine who wears their belts. If you think that their system of having multiple champion recognition in each division is a flawed one why don't you simply disregard them as a legitimate organisation, much as you do re. the IBO? It's Bozos like you you keep this bull**** system going, still recognising an org like the WBA as legitimate despite the way it carries on. Yes, their belt was once legit but those days are long gone. You're living in the past, man. You're hung up on some org from the 60's man. [ame]http://http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GuP9YClyPRY[/ame] How do you live with yourself?
**** off Toni you wanker. I know all the orgs are pretty much corrupt just like your friends the IBO. You're the one who tippy toes around the IBO's corruption and crooked dealings just so they let you write your articles. Can you PM me a few of your boxing articles for a laugh.
hahah yes mr "i think the interim title that danny won is the same as a regular / full belt". ur just full of mud .
probably comparable to picking on a shot eubank. in all seriousness u gotta be good and put in the work to make it.
Bozo, if you know they're all pretty much corrupt why do you refer to some as legitimate? Why did you even go to the mental effort of trying to distinguish who the true WBA champ is? Your insults re. Tony and the IBO are also a wasted effort since I'm neither. But I see you get great amusement from your own jokes so feel free to keep it going.
Hey Toni when did I ever refer to anyone as the legitimate champion ? I just mentioned that as far as the WBA are concerned in their organisation Cotto is the king at 154 lbs. Seriously send me a PM with some of your articles. I would genuinely like to read them. :good