This is the same **** you pulled with Juan Manuel Marquez & Marco Antonio Barrera. Sooner or later you're going to have to realise that this a Boxing forum. The whole purpose of it being in existance is so that Boxing fans can discuss and debate matters such as these. There's nothing wrong with the thread or the poll. Just answer it the best way you can and move on. Simple, really.
As if I'm going to stop making threads about top boxers from this century because you don't like it. Get ****ed.
Are you being serious or trolling? I'm at work so don't really have time for the usual trolling games. Are you seriously saying that Froch has never beaten anyone as good as Charles Brewer? Seriously? :shock:
I fail to see your point. There is nothing wrong in beeing a hater or a fanboy as long as you ARGUE FOR YOUR BLOODY OPINION. This thread, if it is an attempt to hate, is a perfectly valid way of doing so.
Er, not really. I'm more than happy with the way things are thanks - Hopkins is going down in history as a stone-cold ATG, and Calzaghe will be lucky if he makes the HOF - which is exactly as it should be, considering their respective careers and skillsets. So if you're done with that, can we get back on topic maybe??
get over it! Calzaghe was better and always will be. sad that he doesn't have the greatest resume, but his skill can't be denied, he would mop the floor with Froch easily...
Question: What is better, A or B? Answer: Get over it! Conclusion: The answer came from a ******, because it doesn't make sense.
Well, obviously it can when the question is: best top 5 wins. That has nothing to do with who unified and who didn't. Charley Burley never won the world middleweight title, yet Alan Minter did, yet Burley's best wins are infinitely better. Titles are irrelevant when all that's under consideration is who has the better wins.