Great Britain vs. Poland - A history of dominance

Włodarczyk got a gift decision over Cunningham and Palacios.

So that's only two real champions.

 

Ups I didn't know you have problem with reading posts and
I should keep you by hand like a lovely girl :

here are the links to compare:

Select period from 1994 and list English and Polish champions ... that
will be somehow fair ... and even better would be if you exclude these
who are not English ... i.e. these who don't have any English parents.

Is that fair enough?

 

Come on you don't wanna go in this direction,
we will end up with Ricky's chin very soon
and how much he was hugging Tszyu for winning his title.

Wlodarczyk for your knowledge won titles 2x
... go to boxrec and read if you can

 

What about Ricky's chin?

See Mr.Polak, your knowledge is looking very thin. Yet again, your reading has let you down.

Did you not see me state that both Cunningham and Palacios were robbed?

You ****ing ******.

:rofl:roflatsch

 

Great Britain has produced a number of excellent fighters over the years, but very few have been ethnically English ala Ricky Hatton.

Hence while Great Britain has a legacy edge over Poland, I am not quite sure how muchof an edge English fighters hold over their Polish cousins.

 

And who he beat for the second title was that Palacios or Fragomeni?
... you just show how stupid you are.

 

Glenn Catley
Nicky Cook
Paul Ingle
Robin Reid
Richie Woodhall
Clinton Woods
Ricky Hatton

 

The point is, he shouldn't have that title. Palacious should.

 

And because he won two controversial decisions he aint real champion
so you can remove him from the list .... mind to analyse all English
champions in the same way ... mister rightful?

SO how about Richy got stretched for like 5 minutes so he aint
a real champion, he is just a *****, he should not be listed. :huh

 

atsch

I really ain't that bothered Cunningham and Palacios were robbed.

 

OK then

vs

Adamek
Michalczewski
Wlodarczyk

its like 7:3 for England which is fair to me.

You can start analyse this from now how much you want.

From English list only Ricky was a real champion in his division,
both Adamek and Michalczwsski were real champions in their divisions
... other were just belt-holders. So lets add one point for being
a man in the division and this ends up in 8:5 for England
if you now account the population difference 51/38
is more like 8:7 for England.

Is that fair?

 

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bXH5TP2K7iE&feature=related[/ame]

 

Adamek wasn't really a ' real ' champion though. He didn't hold the majority of the belts at CW, Haye did.

 

Again? ... come on try to show more respect for yourself.

Haye moved up, Adamek beat Cunnigham for Ring belt and linear title
... he was not unified champion which is somehow a shame but he
was a man at that time.

You are not going to scream about one point I added to Poles ....
don't be sooo insecure, you beat Poles by hair, I bet they can take it like a bitches
.... I mean plumbers .... errrr emigrants.

 

It doesn't matter who Adamek beat, he didn't beat the man at CW. Your points system is stupid anyway, even when handi-capped Britain still wins.