I think he was being facetious, but Narvaez has actually faced dangerous & powerful opponents (just none as powerful and dangerous as Darchinyan, Montiel & Tyson Marquez) - mostly in the last year or two since moving up to super fly. It's a fair criticism of his flyweight opponents - while many of them were quite good - to say that none were really powerful & dangerous (in terms of KO threats).
Who has the better argument, and why? a) Who will be better than 4-0 in world title bouts? b) Who will have a better single win than a huge upset against a much larger and held-in-utmost-p4p-esteem Donaire?
I think it was betfair, but it was a few days ago. (before the thread went up). They may have shifted since.
Wow! I guess nobody's giving narvaes a chance. I doubt he'll get KTFO though. Guy's pretty tough and never been down.
Runito makes opponents miss.But he is no Mayweather with his defense. Pacquiao just brawls. I think Nonito can make Narvaez miss and will counter with that left hook or set him up for it.
Why not? If I was ever to switch from MAB-Tapia, it might well be for Mifune Toshiro. Nobody serious about the art of film (as Addie seems to be) - or the art of epic storytelling, period - can come of manhood age without having seen the GOAT. :bart
According to American-centric critics? I could watch seven 50 times and not get bored but I could not say the same for citizen.