I replaced Mitchell with Hopkins on your list & voted for Calzaghe & since Joe was a more dominant champion & far superior fighter I`m comfortable with my choice.
I remember there were a few people who ranked Calzaghe p4p no1 during Mayweather`s `retirement` ahead of Pac & JMM... whether you agreed with this or not is not the point, fact is that Froch has & will never be in that class, Calzaghe gets **** on here because he beat a lot of peoples favourite fighters & retired undefeated... the guy was a great fighter, not much else to say really.
So ANY question about two any two fighters is a "loaded" or "skewed" question unless that question is all-encompasssing one such "as who had the better career" or "who was a better fighter". Thus, by your logic, all of the following are "loaded/skewed" questions: Normal question in reality - Who has the better top 3 wins at WW: Duran or Trinidad? "Loaded" Question in Ploys' World - Because it is not concerned with Trinidad's greater body of work at the weight Normal question in reality - Who was the better middleweight: Hopkins or Hagler? "Loaded" Question in Ploys' World - Because it is not concerned with Hopkins's work at lightheavyweight Normal question in reality - Who has the better top 5 wins at SMW: Froch or Calzaghe? "Loaded" Question in Ploys' World - Because it is not concerned with Calzaghe's greater body of work at the weight or his work at lightheavyweight Normal question in reality - Who was the better finisher: Tyson or Floyd Mayweather? "Loaded" Question in Ploys' World - Because it is not concerned with Floyd's other skills such as his defence Normal question in reality - Who had the better first title win: Hatton or De La Hoya? "Loaded" Question in Ploys' World - Because it is concerned with De La Hoya's greater career You brain seems unable to differentiate between questions which look at different aspects of boxing. I could go on. Your point-of-view is an indefensible, unjustifiable joke because it's purely predicated on your personal opinion of me (which you admit above), nothing more. :smoke
If only the usual Calzaghe goons realized this Addie, they could've spent pages debating the issue at hand rather than sobbing over their Joe being put in a poll. If only they'd realized it was a fair poll that Calzaghe was a perfectly valid answer to, they could've spent their time explaining why. But that's the type of pedantic, ill-informed, infantile and dim trolls that reside on this forum, sadly.
To be fair, this has kind of turned into one of my favourite threads. It's hilarious how even though it's pages long, only a few posters have actually addressed the thread question. Everyone else has been crying because you dared subject the great Joe Calzaghe to a poll. Pure comedy.
i actually addressed the question in my first post...along with saying that i thought the question was loaded & explaining why...then left. poppy keeps on bringing up the other stuff. i'm just replying. go back to wanking over the dried up sack of **** winny ryder. you're clearly better at that than discussing boxing. :good
that btw is not why i said it was a loaded question. what you are presenting here is a "strawman". anyone i'm done with you & your autistic trolling. get a life poppy. :hi:
yes. completely changing the subject is an entirely approriate response to that post. good work ********. :good