My New Hw list (top 25)

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by lufcrazy, Oct 23, 2011.


  1. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace

    82,092
    22,234
    Sep 15, 2009
    Dempsey was basically a better version of rocky for me.

    He was too hittable to survive against langford.

    Frazier and holy seem obvious choices to me.
     
  2. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace

    82,092
    22,234
    Sep 15, 2009
    Do you have any lists to counter with?

    Yeah i'd like to think i've been consistent as I feel that is the only negative on any list imo.
     
  3. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace

    82,092
    22,234
    Sep 15, 2009
    With sullivan perhaps you're right, but unless i've missed any obvious names i'm afraid I just don't rate his resume that highly.

    Jeffries was prime in 04 and 05 whilst johnson was pretty much the number 1 contender desperate for a title shot.
     
  4. MAG1965

    MAG1965 Loyal Member banned

    34,796
    66
    Dec 1, 2008
    nice work!! You give Holmes a lot of credit. Good to see that. I always thought he was underrated.
     
  5. MAG1965

    MAG1965 Loyal Member banned

    34,796
    66
    Dec 1, 2008
    actually that is a pretty good rating for the Klitchkos.
     
  6. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace

    82,092
    22,234
    Sep 15, 2009
    Thanks!

    Yeah larry gets under appreciated I think. He was pretty a much a complete package all things considered.

    Yeah I find a lot of people make a big hoo haa about whether or not they should be classed as lineal and they forget what they've actually achieved with respect to their era. I ignore all this "hw is now a weak division" bull**** because it's totally irrelevant to anything imo.
     
  7. Casamayor122

    Casamayor122 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,102
    6
    Oct 17, 2009
    lufcrazy, where is Odlanier Solis for Vitali?
     
  8. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,088
    3,776
    Sep 14, 2005
    Dempsey was absolutely not a better version of Rocky. Rocky was far more proven than Dempsey against top opposition as well. Rocky was the smarter fighter, better stamina, stronger..with power being equal. I like Rocky to survive Dempsey early, and to overtake Dempsey late. It would be all Marciano after round 7

    Langford looks very hittable on film against Jeanette. Stands straight up, stationary, no head movement, he would be a sitting duck for a non stop punching machine like Marciano. It would be a war, but I like rocky's superior workrate to enable him to pull out the decision against Sam. Rocky has the chin and toughness to take some of Sam's heavy artillery.

    Holyfield would brawl against Marciano, and that would be his downfall. Rocky was the superior two handed puncher with strength and stamina being equal. If we take the roided 217lb Holyfield, then Marciano might lose, but Rocky also didn't take steroids.

    Rocky beats Frazier..in a brawl you take the guy with the slighty better chin, the guy whose stronger, and the the guy with the superior TWO handed punching ability. Rocky beats Joe. This would be another War!
     
  9. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace

    82,092
    22,234
    Sep 15, 2009
    He never actually cracked the monthly ratings. He might do so in future and earn a retrospective placing however.
     
  10. Casamayor122

    Casamayor122 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,102
    6
    Oct 17, 2009
    I'm pretty sure he was a Ring TOP10 HW.

    Your opinion of him was pretty high as well:

     
  11. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,088
    3,776
    Sep 14, 2005
    Marciano going 0-4 against Dempsey, Holyfield, Frazier, and Langford is quite a big travesty in my opinion.
     
  12. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace

    82,092
    22,234
    Sep 15, 2009
    Yeah I thought he was the future. Infact at one point I favoured him over every active hw.

    With hindsight I can see it was all hype and no substance.

    He never cracked the monthly top ten.
     
  13. the cobra

    the cobra Awesomeizationism! Full Member

    12,028
    119
    Jun 30, 2008
    I value resume above all else. Judging by your list I'd say dominance is the most important factor for you, right?

    Anyway, my list. I've split the list up into tiers. If two fighters are in the same group that simply means I could convince myself of a valid argument for either one to outrank the other.

    1. Muhammad Ali

    2. Joe Louis

    3. Evander Holyfield
    4. Larry Holmes
    5. Lennox Lewis
    6. George Foreman
    7. Rocky Marciano

    8. Joe Frazier
    9. Mike Tyson
    10. Jack Johnson

    11. Sonny Liston
    12. Jim Jeffries
    13. Harry Wills
    14. Jack Dempsey

    15. Ezzard Charles
    16. Sam Langford

    17. Jersey Joe Walcott
    18. Floyd Patterson
    19. Gene Tunney
    20. Wladimir Klitschko
    21. Riddick Bowe

    22. Peter Jackson
    23. Max Schmeling
    24. Ken Norton
    25. Joe Jeanette


    Or something like that.
     
  14. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace

    82,092
    22,234
    Sep 15, 2009
    That's the point isn't it, it's all opinion.

    Another way of looking at it is a man who comes in the ring about the same weight as chad dawson is a top ten atg heavyweight.

    Mythical match ups will never be proven.

    I have no reason to think frazier has a worse chin than rocky because I envision rocky suffering the same fate vs big george.

    It's all opinion with none more valid than the next.
     
  15. Casamayor122

    Casamayor122 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,102
    6
    Oct 17, 2009
    This is your personal monthly top ten?

    You have put some "real killers" in there for the other boxers but a RING TOP10 HW, Olympic Gold Medalist and multiple World Amateur Champion is not good enough for you? :lol: