Jack Johnson vs. Jeffries in 1905

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by KuRuPT, Oct 20, 2011.


  1. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,094
    27,956
    Jun 2, 2006

    So are you saying he had no strength at the start ? Because he lost the first 3 rounds,and only drew the 4th .If it was a pure matter of depleted stamina/ strength ,surely he would have performed reasonably well initially and, then faded?

    Possibly because he was 38years old,[ 2 months off 39,] in the first stages of Parkinson's syndrome ,and had a major thyroid deficiency for which he had been misdiagnosed,also possibly because he had a long hard career, facing the biggest hitters the ring has seen , men who were real heavyweights, over 200lbs
    Liston,Foreman,Shavers,Lyle,Frazier,Norton.

    Jeffries had a comparatively easy career, true he was carved up by Fitz and Choynski , but both were 167lbs.

    Jeffries had 22 fights when he went in with Johnson, he had boxed 200 rounds, and he had a year and a half to prepare for the fight.

    Jeffries had stretched 18 fights over 10 years.

    Ali had 54 fights over 2 decades.3 wars with Norton, 3 wars with Frazier, he absorbed a tremendous amount of punishment in those ,now include the Foreman fight,and these punishing fights were after his prime.

    There was negligible mileage on Jeffries clock.

    Ali took more punishment in sparring than Jeffries in several of his fights.
    Ali had 520 rounds of wear and tear on his body when he fought Holmes.

    I think this may have had something to do with Ali's non performance against a 6'3" 212 lbs heavyweight Champion who is in my top 5 of all time.
    What say you?
     
  2. KuRuPT

    KuRuPT Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,462
    2,812
    Aug 26, 2011
    Again with the lost strength... He didn't lose any strength if at all grant.. other can see it.. why can't you. Any strength he lost was due to his stamina in the later rounds as well as taking punishment. However, in the early rounds he would've been as strong or nearly as strong as he was in 05'. Yet, in those rounds.. he didn't ragdoll Johnson like you suggested he would've if it was the 05' version. So no matter how you look at it.. your theory that his lost strength was the reason for his loss is **** poor at best.
     
  3. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,094
    27,956
    Jun 2, 2006
    In this link ,reporter Bill Slattery tries to assess Jeffries chances.

    http://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/l...IGHTERS+READY+RESTING+EVE+GREATEST+RNG+BATTLE


    The link below concentrates on the wind up of their training and Johnson's rise to prominence. It also gives an overview of Jeffries fights with Corbett, stating Corbett won the vast majority of the first twenty rounds in their intial contest, and Jeffries corner told him he needed a ko to win

    It states Jeffries won their second fight without too much difficulty. The second fight with Fitz is covered ,and the amount of punishment Jeffries abosrbed before he kod the 39 year old Fitz.
    Interestingly, it also gives the gate receipts for some of Jeffries fights and a number of others.

    http://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/l...FFRIES+JOHNSON+WINDING+UP+THEIR+DAYS+TRAINING
     
  4. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    59,744
    43,077
    Feb 11, 2005
    Hey, now you're sounding like me. Agreed on all points.

    He was a giant in a time that Tom Sharkey was referred to as being a big man, when the Galveston Giant was all of 6 foot 1 and 190 pounds at the time of his christening....
     
  5. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,094
    27,956
    Jun 2, 2006
    Uh Oh ,I'm in trouble.
    Seriously ,would Jeffries be able to manhandle guys like Louis [,who picked Carnera up bodily at one point?]
    Liston, Foreman, Ali, Holyfield, [who backed Tyson up].
    Sharkey was a pocket battleship , but he was 5'8" and around 180lbs. I'm 63 in a month , when I was a kid, if a man was 6 foot tall it was remarked upon.
    All of my sons in law are bigger than Jeffries was , he would be a small heavy today.


    Jim Coffey seen below 6' 1", never over 208lbs
    Called the " Roscommon Giant"

    This content is protected
     
  6. he grant

    he grant Historian/Film Maker

    25,099
    8,852
    Jul 15, 2008
    No I clearly said he lost the opening rounds because he did not have a fight in six years and at age 35 his timing and speed were **** in addition to his overall deterioration. Are you claiming his extended retirement compounded by a joke of a training camp where hunted daily but rarely sparred properly prepared him to fight a prime Johnson? Let's not be absurd.

    I stand by my position that Jeffries was as poorly prepared for Johnson as Ali was for Holmes. While your pushing your subjective math dont forget 13 and 72 ... the number of months Ali and Jeffries were out of the ring between their title bouts.
     
  7. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,094
    27,956
    Jun 2, 2006
    I'm not pushing anything ,I told you that in my view Ali was a sick man when he fought Holmes and medical reports confirm that.
    Anything wrong with Jeffries, apart from inactivity?

    Jeffries two major fights were over men who had been retired for 2 years and 3 years,one was33/36 , the other 37/39.
    Another win was over a 37 years old , tubercular and ,alcoholic man who had been retired for 3 years and had one fight in 6 years [Jackson] another was over a man 40 years old [Goddard].

    Reno was a classic case of ;

    THE BITER BIT.
     
  8. Mendoza

    Mendoza Hrgovic = Next Heavyweight champion of the world. banned Full Member

    55,255
    10,334
    Jun 29, 2007
    Johnson was never walked back or pushed around in his other filmed fights. This just goes to show this tactic would not work vs. bigger and stronger men. It only worked vs the smallish stationary type of fighters that Johnson often hand picked for his title matches. Johnson beat the shell of Jim Jeffries who lost close to 100 pounds, and had not fought a round in 5 years. Those who have the film of the rounds will tell you many of them were close. The only flimed rounds that are one sided on the flims are the 14th when Jeffries ran out of gas and could not keep his hands up, and the 15th.

    In 1905, the winner would have been Jeffries.
     
  9. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,748
    21,557
    Nov 24, 2005
    Jeffries in 1910 was probably weakened a bit by his weight loss, and generally out of condition. He was still likely very strong though, on pure physical strength.
    And Johnson probably peaked in physical strength in 1909 an 1910.

    In 1905 Jeff would be a bit stronger, and Johnson was not yet as strong.


    I think any decent sized heavyweight was called a "giant" in those days. It was hype and language of the day. Remember, anyone over 158 pounds was a heavyweight.
    It's not that people were that much smaller in those days. They just liked to hype up the legit full sized heavyweights. It is remarkable when a man fights as well as being big, and old-time writers and promoters made a big thing out of it. Crowds would be drawn to see big men fighting.
     
  10. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,094
    27,956
    Jun 2, 2006
    Johnson was not pushed around in the Reno fight, quite the opposite he put Jeffries arms up his back at one point and called out to Corbett ,"where do you want him?"
    Are you saying ALL the ringside reports of the fight are false/inaccurate/lying? I have only posted a few, there are several more ,all concurring with them .
    Since 99% of the public,and media were rooting for Jeffries, surely reporters would put as favourable a gloss on Jeffries performance ,and,give him the benefit of the doubt in closely contested rounds?

    Johnson fought far more big men than Jeffries who only faced ONE man of 200lbs

    Many of the rounds were not close at all ,as film and reports emphatically tell us ,the only poster who propagates this canard is yourself.

    Tex Rickard ,who worshipped Jeffries told a reporter from the New York Tribune immediately the fight was over.

    "Jack Johnson is the most wonderful fighter that ever pulled on a glove, he won as he pleased from Jeffries.And was never in danger.
    I could not help but feel sorry for the big whiteman as he fell before the champions blows.
    It was the most pitiable sight I ever saw.
    As a matter of fact,I thought Jeffries would be the winner of the fight."


    "Jeffries could not hit Johnson,and Johnson could hit Jeffries whenever he pleased" .
    Rickard as the referee ,was closest to the action ,but you continue in denial, its become a habit with you now.
    CASE CLOSED , NEXT!
     
  11. KuRuPT

    KuRuPT Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,462
    2,812
    Aug 26, 2011
    Well good, I'm glad hegrant finally conceded that Jeffries was probably ever bit as strong in 10' as he was in 05'
     
  12. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    59,744
    43,077
    Feb 11, 2005
    I think it's worth noting that Ketchell, who was in Jeff's camp, thought so little of Jeff's shape and fighting form that he threatened to KO Jim during the ring introductions so as to save the White Race the disgrace who knew was coming.
     
  13. he grant

    he grant Historian/Film Maker

    25,099
    8,852
    Jul 15, 2008
    Either your a clown or English is not your first language ... either way, reading your distortions are a bit of a bore. Perhaps you can back up yet another false claim by detailing where I made this statement ...

    I personally believe your a clown under a false name simply trying to stir a pot .. no surprise actually. :yep
     
  14. he grant

    he grant Historian/Film Maker

    25,099
    8,852
    Jul 15, 2008
    All that's wonderful and meaningless ... we're talking about Johnson and Jefferies ... I happen to love Johnson . I just don't have the same rose colored glasses you do for the guy .. It is the same old run where guys cannot look at their favorites warts and all ... to try and build a case that a professional prize fighter who had been out of the ring for six years and returns in his mid-30's is as strong as he was in his prime is a joke. Kaput (LOL) makinging this case is understandable as he's simply a regular under an alias attempting to stir a pot ( and basically getting only yawns) but you're a knowledgable guy and know better ...
     
  15. KuRuPT

    KuRuPT Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,462
    2,812
    Aug 26, 2011
    Sure, no problem.. You first said this:

    "In 05 Jeffries big ... way too strong and well conditioned ... very few fighters have had their reputations destroyed and career distorted like Jeffries had by Reno ... from all the photos of a flabby, balding middle aged man in cartoon like training togs in training to his helpless , lost gaze from the floor in the 15th round, the prime Jeffries is all but forgotten ... one has to read Adam's exceptional, impartial book with all of it's extensive first hand coverage and photographs to see the contrast between that Jeffries and the man who dominated his division years earlier ...

    The prime Jeffries as at the very least an even match for a prime Johnson. Stronger, a harder hitter, just as well conditioned, near impossible to hurt and an extremely smart fighter, in 05 Jeffries would have beaten him badly. In addition, all this talk of how strong Johnson was is slightly overrated ... yes he had big biceps and was cut up in 08 and threw around 168 pounders like Burns and Ketchel but head to head with a 218 pound Jeffries is simply another matter ... JOhnson was a master of leverage, he knew how to pin an opponents arm ... I do not see him as successful pulling that against a prime JIm ... a prime Ali was an exceptionally strong fighter but he sure did not look that way against Holmes ..just my thoughts ..."

    I responded with this:

    "So you're saying Jeffries had lost MOST of his strength by the time they fought in Reno? I just don't see that as true. I believe he lost some of his timing and reflexes... but strength I just don't see him having lost very much of that. Thus, in the 1910 fight.. when Johnson basically toyed with Jeff and his strength.. I see no reason why Jeffries would push around Johnson in 1905. Johnson was the better boxer plain and simple. Better offensive arsenal (when he used it) and better defense. I'm not sure Johnson could put away Jeffries.. but make no mistake... he would make jeffries face look like swiss cheese. Prime for Prime I take Johnson.. While Johnson might not have been at his absolute prime in 05.. he was close enough for me to say he wins."

    Then you said this:

    "First off, Jeffries had not fought in close to six years. He had shed a ton of weight way too fast. Your assertion that he did not lose much strength from his physical prime six years earlier is illogical.

    Secondly, Marvin Hart was all over Johnson. I'm sure Jack deserved the decision but there is no getting around the fact that a man much smaller, weaker and overall inferior to Jeffries gave Johnson twenty competitive rounds in a must win fight for Jack. BY every account Hart was the aggressor and landed hard and often. There is simply no getting around this fact. When facted with a decent sized man who was strong and aggressive Johnson was not so great ... a prime Jeffries was light years better in every way than the same Hart ... "


    There ya go.. it's all right there... You said I'm crazy to not think that Jeffries hadn't lost most of his strength in 10' . Now I'm curious to see if you'll change the goalposts again like you already tried to do or go with you nah I didn't say it.. even though it's clearly right there for all to see. You ASSERT that Jeffries had lost most of his physical strength.. I disagreed, just like most have disagreed he lost most of his strength. His strength was probably very close to what it was in 05' considering that is one of the last things to go.. he was still doing manual labor.. and was working his muscles back into shape to lose the weight. Thanks for playing though