The "All Things Mayweather/Pacquiao" Express!!!!!!

No, he didn't. Although, I'm pretty sure whatever he said, you twisted it to mean that to you.

 

I posted up a poll to have better idea of what people think

 

Pacquiao has the better resume than mayweather an why is he keeps on saying pacquiao take steroids?? he's afraid to lose to pacquiao.

 

Yes, he did! So, my interpretation is wrong, but you're "pretty sure" I got it twisted?! GTFOH, dude! I'm not some dumb, blind Pac fan - I don't make assumptions or misinterpret things. He said it. How the f*%k do you know he didn't say it?! I should know more that he DID say it than you would know that he DIDN'T say it! You would have to have heard EVERYTHING that he said in his whole entire life to know that he didn't say it. I would only have to have heard him once to know that he did say that.

This content is protected

!

 

all this don't mean sh*t without proof...links?

 

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rEnPEz_rSoU[/ame]

 

Manny, period.

 

... but, to answer the thread - Pac's resume is better (on paper), May's competition was better.

 

this is correct

 

from the scene.

this article was after Margo beat Cotto and before he lost to Shane...and again, Roach has little to no say at all who Pac fights. Roach does not and has never selected or negotiated who Pacquiao fights.

 

for me manny's faught the better names but floyd's competition was better at the time of the fight

 

See, I knew I could get u to give it up!..This time I wont remind you about the whole undefeated thing..LOL..Ya win some & you lose some!

 

Floyd took two peoples' 0's. Thats 2/42 = .048 meaning 95.2% of his fights were against leftovers.

Pac took 6 people's 0's. That's 6/58 = .103 meaning 89.6% of his fights were against leftovers.

 

It's true, some people are more stupid than others!:-(