So what if he fought alvarez. Its not like he had anything to lose, nobody expected him to win including himself. Fair enough if he loves the sport and wants to make a bit of money but stop talking **** about world titles and fight a live opponent like brook. You can argue brooks record is not much but that was fwanks fault, hatton is taking every short cut available because he is ****. They wont even put him in with witter because they know its more then possible he would embarrass himself. Brook smashes hatton and i would fancy woodhouses chances as well.
:rofl You are a ****** my friend, so he takes on a world class fighter less than 8 months ago and your attitude towards it is.. " So what if he fought Alvarez he had nothing to loose " In your next sentence he should fight a live opponent. hahaha!! Wtf was Alverez you ****? You should ask yourself when is Brook going to fight a live opponent? The guys best win is a guy Hatton fought 19 months prior to him fighting him.
Your the ****** mate! Who wins out of brook and hatton? Its obvious. He survived against alvarez who if anyones honest was nothing more then going through the motions, your a spastic if you dont realise that. He is **** and you know nothing if you think he is worthy of a world shot!
You've just said Witter would beat him. Any ''high ground'' you had disappeared right there. All you've got to do is keep something in his face and the job's done, his punches come via telegram these days, Hatton is probably tough enough to take his best shots anyway.
You are going off topic here, you are a bit simple, I have just ripped apart the initial points you made and proved they are bollocks. Now you have asked other questions, Brook would beat Hatton I agree, now I didn't say he deserves a world title shot did I? Your opening questions and opinions were crap mate. :good
Why not make the fight then? It would sell, and he would have a former world champ on his record. They like easy fights and if they thought matt could beat him they would make! Fact is they dont fancy it with witter or brook end of. This alvarez **** makes me laugh, that goes down as his best performance says alot about hatton!
1whites, what's your opinion on how Ryan Rhodes performed against Alvarez? I actually think he looked pretty poor myself, but nobody labelled him as some kind of fraud or failure did they? Matthew Hatton has been guilty of making hay whilst the sun shines, that's all. I agree he's in a loftier position than his abilities might merit, but so what? God luck to him.
Alvarez took rhodes seriously hence the result. Rhodes is a good european level fighter who wont be able to live with the elite. Hatton scraped through because canelo knew he was no threat. It gets on my nerves the way he avoids british fighters because he knows he is finished if he loses. Losing to alvarez was the best result in his career and thats poor!
I think calling someone a "******" or a "moron" are times when you should really cover your arse on the spelling side of the post.
Do you have any evidence at all that Alvarez took Rhodes more serious than Hatton or is that just some crap you made up on the spot to try and help your arguement.