The "All Things Mayweather/Pacquiao" Express!!!!!!

Mayweather oppoents are in the very good to solid range.

Pacquiao oppoents are in the has been to never were range.

 

Barrera had just beaten Hamed like 1 or 2 fights ago. He was top 10 P4P at the time. Nobody expected Pacquiao to even put up a fight. I guess you weren't watching boxing back then.


Corrales was a more a never was. He never lived up to what I though he could be. When he did do things I thought he should have been doing like fighting tall and using his jab, he looked pretty good. But he'd often abandon that and that's why I say he's not as great as people say he was.

 

"ya win some & you lose some".... Oh man, you're taking this whole act to another level. What exactly you believe yourself to be "winning" I have no clue but I'm so looking forward to another "Merkaveli" borderline ******ed post! You really throw yourself into your role. It's almost scary if not for the fact that your logic and posts are hilarious. :rofl

"42-0":rofl This **** is dumb funny!

 

good summary

 

U had to go and run ya mouph again huh..LOL...42-0 Hoe!

 

HAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!..That little poll dont mean ANYTHING...Most the people who voted where Pacturds who didnt even leave comments..LOL..Or biased Floyd haters...Most people who left comments just laughed at how much of a mediacreated chump Pac is..LOL..Do yaself a favor and learn about the game of boxing!

 

does floyd have something in his resume like fighting future HOF/ATGs like in their primes like barrera, marquez and morales in a span of just 16 months virtually back-to-back-to-back?

i know floyd has two vacations of 16 months and 20 months in his resume.

 

so if you sincerely believe Pacquiao's resume is better, you're automatically a *******. atsch

 

You disappointed "Merky boy"? Did I let you down?:rofl I thought you enjoyed someone giving you the platform for your performance..... And why you gotta start with the name calling?

Desperation?:think Never a good look on a man....or even a boy as in your case. Again....you don't have to sell me, it ain't gonna work. But you need to step your game up dunny.:yep

 

Barrera was the expition on Pacquiao's resume. He lost to a prime Morrales and beat him less than prime twice.

Corrales was very good when they fought and over all comes into the solid range in his overall career.

 

42-0!

 

No need to say anything further. The poll result says it all.

 

Yea because there are FACTS that say other wise..Pac's ENTIRE record consist of guys he ducked, other fighters he ducked then fought them washed up, or coming off losses...I think what makes a fighter great, is when they fight the best, and survive through it all....but if he would have fought tim austyn, mark johnson, humberto soto, zahir rahim, he wouldnt even be hear today...just my thought!

 

So you're saying Morrales went from prime to past prime in a span of 10 months? And then the same people wil say DLH was prime when Floyd fought him just because Floyd beat him close.

 

Isan't Roach talking about Pacquiao fighting Ortiz next? The pattern contunes.