The problem with Juan Manuel Marquez....

What's bad being a mexican?

At least he does not run or ride a bike!!!!! That is another race.

If you lose and fought like a man, I tip my hat to you.

If you won and ride your bike while doing so, join a beauty contests. Those are for sissies.

 

Your ancestors are in San Francisco and in Greenwich Village in New York. ****ing ****** ass Fruitloop. Funky ass sub shop smelling armpits dick breath having hook nosed devil.

 

You don't have a clue about black history, or the continent of Africa. You mother****ers aren't Egyptians. You come from Europe.

 

the problem is he got KD's from PAC early in the fight...that's why , if you just take away those he would have clearly won those 2 matches

 

I disagree. Think Pac made Marquez fight him a bit. More importantly, I think Marquez choosing to box, counter, and at times fight gave him an added unpredictability which helped him win some of the rounds he did. When he sticks to merely boxing and counter-punching, rather than leading the right hand or hooks he sometimes has a tendency of being out-worked. At the same time, if he's getting into too many exchanges this always seemed to favor Pacman. There had to be a balance. However, Marquez has to be extra careful at this weight with Pac being this much stronger and better in my view (Which is why I don't think Marquez will win).

 

why you mad nagglege?

 

:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl this thread is hilarious

 

:deal I like it!

The only thing about trying to be a conservative counter-puncher.... that wouldn't be like a true-blooded mexican, would it? And we wouldnt have had these epic fights?

Marquez needs to feel he can shift to his personal offense, not settling and stuck counter-punching and defensive measures, though he's at his most effective this way vs Pac. Why? Cuz he's not fighting on his terms but on Pacquiao's... and that wouldnt be Macho.

I love these mexicans for this "trait" alot of them / stereotyped in have. They commit themselves all the way, even if it takes them down a possible road of losing.

A degradation of boxing is being caused with this attitude of "fighting to not lose" vs "fighting to win". One version mitigates damage enough thru controlling methods in order to ensure a win at the end - ala Mayweather. Other version is opening yourself up and taking risks for a brave grasp of a victory.

Though i like winners, i prefer the latter version. Bravery always wins in my book. If i need to feel like a winner, "I" compete in a sport, not attempt to live vicariously through another, filled with the insecurity of possibly losing...

 

Yep in their second fight, the commentators even mentioned that JMM should be more aggressive in the later rounds, because he is being outworked by Pacquiao.

 

The problem with marquez is he puts all the weight on in his upper body. If you think this fight will be close you are delusional.

 

abu wishes he was smart enough to have this kind of vocabulary

 

Bull****, bull**** and more bull****.

Following the draw in 2004, there was an immediate demand for a rematch from the boxing public. Pac wanted it.

There was a purse parity offer on the table. From what I can recall, it was $750K each. JMM said he wanted more, despite $750 K being the highest purse he had seen yet to that point. Pac's camp said no way JMM should get more than parity. JMM went to Indonesia for $ 35 K :nut

The Morales fight was only discussed after the JMM rematch option fell
through.

 

your filipino, you're the **** children of burrito eaters and the chinese.

 

grow your wavy hair out to sell your 26inch waist AZZ on the corner