Pac would fight Floyd winner takes all

This:happy

It would be a very good stipulation though. But I would have to call bull**** on that one. Arum could/would say no. And Pac would just be like "well I would've but Bob wouldn't let me."

 

atsch Yeah, get excited over that post. NO ONE in boxing would do that. But of course they would say yes if asked. Floyd would probably say the same thing.

Just another example of floyd fanboy ******ation. :nut

 

:rofl

 

Is it in the fanboy handbook that you have to post approving emoticons after other fanboys? :huh

Or wait, you really are laughing HARD at a comment that isn't even remotely funny? :nut

 

This content is protected

 

How is this even applicable? I already know you floyd fanbopys aren't that intelligent, so leaps are made quite often with you ******s.

No worries. We cool! :thumbsup

 

Too many people have to be paid in both fighters camps. It's not even feasible in this day and time. Sounds good, but realistically, won't happen.

 

boxing is too corrupted to have a winner takes all fight

plus there is too much money involved to do it

 

They should do this, but take judges out of the equation. They should fight until one of them gets knocked out, taps out, or quits on the stool. In an actual fight, I think Mayweather can run and potshot Pac to a points victory. In this scenario, Pac would have the overwhelming advantage.

 

It would be nice if there were SOME kind of extra monetary bonus for the winners in boxing.

Of course, the way boxing goes, a win generally does help you financially in terms of your next fight, drawing power and whatnot, but I'd like it if there were some sort of extra split if you win.

 

Reactionary thread, created to support nonsensical false reality. :nono

 

Arum wouldn't allow it. So, it really does not mean much.

 

floyd would accept?

 

winner would get 55%...i think that would be fair

 

you know, it's easy to say something like this, because it's impossible...