Pacquiao is not only much greater than Marquez, but a much better fighter too.

If loads of chumps were on here saying Pascal had better ability than B-Hop, don't worry, a thread would be forthcoming same as this one, even longer and more virulent though, since the difference between Hop and Pascal is much greater than that between Pac and JMM.

Then you could come on and tell me how if B-Hop had no defence then Pascal would be a more rounded fighter than him, or some other pearl of fantasy nonsense.

 

Explain why these points are biased:

:smoke

 

As usual, a biased, engineered thread starter by pfp the 8th ranked ******* in the world!

 

I can't tell if this is sheer hatred or sheer idiocy.

 

A forum where the standard of knowledge and fight analysis is actually significantly better than on here IMO! :good

I hear what you're saying about my Penn-Diaz point mate, but I don't think that suggesting that if you reversed the natural size advantage would reverse the way the fight went is quite the same as saying "remove one fighter's speed and power". Reversing the natural size advantage is merely a way of saying that one man was disadvantaged in the fight, something Nick himself admitted. Removing a guy's speed and power is being too specific, obviously if Pac didn't have speed and power he'd have to fight in a completely different way, so it's completely pointless trying to somehow imagine him without it.

 

Wow. Frighteningly thorough write-up indeed...I'm not sure what I can add, you pretty much covered all the bases.

This was an interesting read, but it is lufcrazy so it is to be expected. :good

 

Go crawl back behind Leonard Ellerbe's ballbag you ***** stinktard. :hi:

 

Congratulations, At least you've convinced yourself

 

Why do you keep ducking the points I'm making? If you're too much of a cowardly shitbag to confront the points I keep putting you, why hang around like a fart making shitty little one-sentence posts??? :rofl

 

Don't get pissed just because your tenuous arguments aren't convincing anyone

 

Yes, because making four concrete statements and repeatedly challenging a coward to confront them one by one is so "tenuous" isn't it?



Stop running *****:

:smoke

 

Quick question just to verify whether or not you're just a biased idiot or an objective fight fan.

This content is protected

Think carefully before you answer cause that will be the deciding factor on whether or not I waste anymore time on you:deal

 

Yeah, we'll find out if Pacquiao and Roachs waiting for Marquez to get old has paid off!

 

This ******* will defend Pacquiao to the death. ***** envy. He wishes he was ****ing Pacquiao himself. ****ing ******. Shower peeper, scrotum massager, and Pacquiaos personal rim job moistener.

 

Yes.

One fight.

The Shane Mosley fight was a cherrypick.

That is all.

Now do you fancy addressing ANY of the FOUR points you have been ducking?

:think