Marquez-Pacquiao Robbery Thread

atsch

Shut the **** up... cool story *****..nutcase:smoke

 

worse than Lewis-Holyfield 1 in terms of robbery in big fights?

For me not, but i'm a neutral who thinks JMM has won his 3 fights against Pac. It's incredible that his official record read 0-1-2 against Pac, a total joke.

JMM is the winner on every meter tonight apart from what goes on offical record, Pac loses a lot of respect by saying he won clearly. He obviously doesn't believe that.

 

[quoteAll] these Mexican fans and Pac haters whining...

Here are the plain FACTS, not opinion:

1. Pacquiao THREW more punches than Marquez
2. Pacquiao LANDED more punches than Marquez. This includes power punches.
3. Pacquiao HURT marquez more frequently

And here's a very important opinion:
- Nacho Berenstein gave Marquez TERRIBLE corner advice that led to his fighter's downfall. Like Emmanuel Steward said, telling Marquez he was winning the fight was the biggest blunder his corner made. If he had told him otherwise, maybe Marquez would have stepped it up and won the fight with more activity, or maybe he would have gotten knocked out...either way the advice that was given to him was absolutely terrible.


This was more clear of a victory than the prior bout. Pacquiao showed more intelligence, countered the counter puncher, and deservedly got a win.
Top
][/quote] I didn't realise we were going on the Fight Night Champion scoring system...

 

Lol...I'm glad you are saying this bull**** because it demonstrates how skewed and ignorant your perspective is and just one more jackass no one has to take seriously.

 

1.Mexican fans booed the decision
2. He needs the KO to make his win CONVINVING because the fight was close.
3. He didn't look defeated. He still has to wait for the DECISION from the judges

 

compubox had pac land more. It was another close fight. I had a draw at the most for marquez. had marquez been the aggressor i believe he could have won.

 

A close fight for sure. I had Pac winning 115-113 because he is clearly the agressor and judges always favor that. Reminds me somehow of Froch/Dirrel.

 

Interesting. Can you explain why the people watching live, with no commentary, errupted into boo's directed at Pac and the decision? It was clear the vast majority thought Matquez was robbed. Can you also explain why Roach told Pac he needed a KO? Come the fuk on.

 

I never realized how many clueless boxing fans are on the Eastside website. If you think JMM is robbed you have to be stupid. Close fight is one thing but robbery is something different. Pac landed more punches and made the fight. JMM ran and tried to counter punch all night. Apparently all the keyboard boxing experts are smarter than Emmanuel Steward.

 

My card was exactly the same as Lederman's. I admit that two rounds were close, but at best that would make it a draw for Marquez.

I felt that Manny fought a smarter fight than the second bout; he deserved this win. That said, he also fought like ****. I don't know if he's past his prime, but I'm relatively sure he still didn't have the right gameplan.

Whoever said that Pac's improvements since the second fight would play more into JMM's hands was right. Pacquiao when he was wild and one-dimensional was a bigger threat and a better show. I hate watching pac trying to fight smart.

 

Robbery and domination my ass! lol

Marquez didnt dominate pacquiao

it was a close fight,

watch it again and you will see that pacquiao connected more, landed more than marquez

and whenever marquez landed, pacquiao always came back

and why was marquez backing up all the time and manny is always the aggressor, how does someone dominate when you're always backing up?

 

Obvious pac biased by the Hbo team except for max kellerman who kept it real. Pac won a max of 4 rounds and that's the truth. Politics at its best for a mayweather fight but come on now. Even Filipino fans that I know admit jmm schooled pac. Jmm caught pac with all kinds of combination punches with no answer. Pac was lost and confused and his corner was begging for a k.o because they knew that was his only shot. This is an absolute disgrace!! Mayweather will come in for the kill now after watching this. Mayweather is going to murder pacroid with no question. Sad day for boxing again with this robbery.

 

Ill say one thing, It a dam shame and very disrespectful the way Lampley, Steward, and Lederman carried on that bull****, slanted dialouge in Pacs favor as if boxing fans are so stupid that they would reject the evidence of thier own eyes. 70% of the crowd and judging by these posts, 70% see the fight as a Marquez win. Pac was in his corner praying to every god he knew before the decision was read. He knows in his heart that he loss that fight. Pac is an honorable man and I bet he cant look at himself in in mirror and say he won.The fight bore fruit to other truths and that is that Pac is mostly a hype job and Money will beat the mother****in brakes off his ass.

 

LOL eze the ***** finally speaks against pac when he finally gets the chance.
Granted I was drunk while watching, but I had it a draw and in no doubt in my mind was this a robbery. A few rounds could have gone either way, and I wouldnt have been surprised if jmm won, but to say it was a robbery is just insane.

Final stats pretty much proved it was a close fight...noticeable, harder shots i saw jmm landing, but pac outlanded and outhrown jmm in the whole fight.

 

1. Pretty sure the JMM fans where the one booing
2. Because he was smarter than Nacho. Nacho really? This is like ODLH vs Tito
3. Because he did not win convincingly.

4. Points 1-3 is pretty weak arguments.

That is like me saying - why is JMM's face more beat up than Pacs?