Now it was not a robbery. Of course at the heat of the battle emotions are high among fans, and Pacquiao is nowadays regarded on high standard and fans are expecting more from him. After re watching the fight, it is not a robbery. Pacquiao win is not a robbery(Pac deserves the victory), but a draw is not a bad decision too.
That was one of the worst decisions I have seen in some time. Marquez dominated a confused and thoroughly beaten Manny. He controlled the fight and I gave him 8 or 9 rounds. I wouldn't watch another fight between the two - what's the point when inept and corrupt judges can't pick the right winner. I feel sorry for Marquez who arguably has the better of Pac in this trilogy - despite what BoxRec says. The Floyd fight is probably further away now than ever given that he may now feel he needs a KO to get a draw. What a horrible decision that really leaves a bad taste. Marquez won clearly.
:think That is one possibility... I just think that for whatever reason Marquez is a conundrum that is difficult for Pacquiao to figure out. It was a close fight. I won't deny that and 115-113 for Pacquiao is a sound score. Listening to the whiners crying :|:|:| "robbery" is a bit much... You want to blame anybody blame Nacho for his stupid advise... Otherwise Pacquiao had a off night and still found a way to win. :smoke
Those 3 judges among the best in the business. Here's the links. Go find me 1 controversial fight in their long careers. This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected :hey
how can jmm win the 12th round when the only meaningful punch there was pacs left straight which snapped jmms head? seriously, jmm won the 12? jmm gave away the 1st and the last round.