Marquez-Pacquiao Robbery Thread

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by eze, Nov 12, 2011.


  1. moulicules

    moulicules Chessmaster Full Member

    806
    0
    Nov 12, 2010
    pac was the aggressor from round 1 to 12, thats why in the compubox he was ahead in punch stat.. JMM do was to running...running then countering all night!
     
  2. whoupicking?

    whoupicking? Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,378
    2
    Mar 4, 2010
    JMM clearly won the fight. It wasn't even close.
     
  3. zato-one

    zato-one Pink Jumpsuit Boxing Full Member

    4,081
    51
    Dec 5, 2007
    like i said, you are an idiot
    This content is protected


    rewatch it man. its a VERY close fight that jmm gave away like oscar to the trinidad fight. WTF was he doing the last 2 rounds?!
     
  4. Gonzarelli

    Gonzarelli Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,063
    1
    Apr 29, 2009
    A ******* and all you could muster was a draw for Pac.

    Clear indication of a JMM victory:deal
     
  5. CoDer

    CoDer Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,914
    0
    Nov 14, 2010
    Should have been a Draw or SD in favor of JMM.
     
  6. boxinger

    boxinger Guest

    yea manny did a lot of sneaky punches and he would move out of the way quickly,

    a lot of it is pretty fast and most people did not see,

    good to see that someone actually saw the fight tonight without bias lol
     
  7. balaclava

    balaclava Guest

    When I saw the fight live I thought a draw or a very close victory for Pacquiao would be okay. But now I re-watched the fight and scored the rounds. I had Marquez winning 118-113 ( I scored 3 rounds even [the 1st, the 4th and the 11th])
    NO WAY IN THE WORLD DID PACQUIAO WIN THIS FIGHT. And I am one of the guys who thinks Pacquiao CLEARLY won the first fight and closely won the 2nd fight. But NO WAY did Pacquiao win the 3rd one.
    Marquez won. PERIOD
     
  8. igor_otsky

    igor_otsky Undefeated Full Member

    14,283
    4
    Jul 26, 2008
    Thar was the main ingredient tol. mosley did this, and now marquez capitalized it against pac. whenever pac leads with his left, juan circles to the left, nullifying pac's best arsenal. this made pac frustrated and made pac the pac we knew 2008. pac had his chances. where was the body punches where he needed it the most? where were the uppercuts whenever jmm ducks low? where was pac's signature lateral movements? well there were times he did this but this were the times he won those rounds.
     
  9. zato-one

    zato-one Pink Jumpsuit Boxing Full Member

    4,081
    51
    Dec 5, 2007
    man such a *******. Shut up *****. Im a fan of boxing, not an individual fighter. Marquez kept backing up the whole fight. You can't beat a champ that way even if you call it effective counter punching.
     
  10. moulicules

    moulicules Chessmaster Full Member

    806
    0
    Nov 12, 2010
    PAC won clearly! got score: 115-113 PAC!
     
  11. Gonzarelli

    Gonzarelli Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,063
    1
    Apr 29, 2009
    *****, moi?:lol:


    That's a *******'s first response:deal
     
  12. LikeIsedb4

    LikeIsedb4 Member Full Member

    352
    0
    Jun 14, 2011
    I had marquez winning the first fight by 2 points pac winning the second fight by 1 point and marquez winning the 3rd fight by 4 points
     
  13. caneman

    caneman 100% AllNatural Xylocaine Full Member

    16,472
    1
    Aug 5, 2009
    But you didn't answer that same question where I did answer yours. There is no other fight to answer your question. You always say Arum doesn't want Floyd, so I'm not sure why you are hinting all of a sudden that Arum needed to cheat JMM to get to Floyd. Quite a dillema huh?
     
  14. jmmpbf

    jmmpbf Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,382
    0
    Aug 25, 2010
    I re scored it again... Marquez by 2-3 clear pts.
     
  15. purephase

    purephase Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,740
    89
    Jan 14, 2011
    Trowbridge had an awful card in Mayorga-Vargas and Moretti was part of the Sturm-Oscar robbery. And I mean if the standard is just "controversial scoring" then you might want to look at Moretti's for Ortiz-Peterson, Hopkins-Taylor II, and Leonard-Hagler.