Two Simple Factors Why Judges Gave Pac the Nod

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by AxlRose, Nov 13, 2011.


  1. AxlRose

    AxlRose Guest

    Forget about Pacquiao being the aggressor or Pacquiao holding the belts that the challenger must prove he won beyond reasonable doubt. :smoke

    Here are the two things Pacquiao simply won without having to compare the standard of winning to Cotto, Margarito or Mosley:



    1. Pacquiao clearly punched harder (we all know this, don't turn a blind eye)

    2. And Pacquiao landed more (the punch stats back it up)


    Simple Math.....Really :smoke
     
  2. SamO408

    SamO408 Active Member Full Member

    846
    0
    Nov 10, 2008
    punched harder??
    any body who watched that fight saw pacs head being repeatedly snapped back. pac never landed authoritatively. is he did, shouldn't of he destroyed jmm?
     
  3. puga_ni_nana

    puga_ni_nana Dempsey Roll Full Member

    41,814
    5
    Apr 14, 2007
    i just think that the judges preferred the aggressor in the close rounds.
     
  4. Hook!

    Hook! Proud member of team G. Full Member

    9,463
    1
    Jun 25, 2011
    oh **** off you bias ****
     
  5. AxlRose

    AxlRose Guest

    So Marquez punched harder?:lol:

    Did he ever floor Pacquiao in their previous encounters? :smoke

    Wow he punches hard......even Ulyses Solis toyed with Manny's head. :smoke
     
  6. banny

    banny Active Member Full Member

    1,418
    0
    Jan 22, 2010
    Th irony of that statement coming from a dude with a Floyd avatar :rofl
     
  7. AxlRose

    AxlRose Guest


    Bias? Who punched harder? Marquez? :patsch

    Who landed more? Marquez? :patsch

    Do the math :good
     
  8. Hook!

    Hook! Proud member of team G. Full Member

    9,463
    1
    Jun 25, 2011
    i have a floyd avatar well done, does that mean that i cannot be objective? i actually like manny a lot just like floyd more. unlike *******s other boxing fans can be objective.
     
  9. Boxing Fanatic

    Boxing Fanatic Loyal Member banned

    48,204
    9
    Sep 16, 2008
    i just saw pure favoritism. pac may have throw more punches but he landed less. jmm was more accurate and picked his spots better. plus, jmm took over the 2nd half of the fight, while manny got wild and missed a lot since he knew it was close fight. jmm chose to counter him when he missed.
     
  10. banny

    banny Active Member Full Member

    1,418
    0
    Jan 22, 2010
    Who won Floyd-Castillo 1? And for the record I thought Pacquiao lost
     
  11. AxlRose

    AxlRose Guest


    Do I need to show you the punch stats? :patsch
     
  12. Boxing Fanatic

    Boxing Fanatic Loyal Member banned

    48,204
    9
    Sep 16, 2008
    u r an idiot if u thought pac won.:deal plus, those stats were bogus. i saw the fight twice. no way in hell pac landed more. he threw more. that is it
     
  13. LondonW2

    LondonW2 Member Full Member

    200
    0
    May 8, 2010
    I think you are right mate, spot on, the rounds were close so they went with the man moving forward.
     
  14. AxlRose

    AxlRose Guest


    Don't be too emotional. Pac did not win like he did vs Cotto etc..like everyone wants him to.....

    But he won :good
     
  15. Gonzarelli

    Gonzarelli Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,063
    1
    Apr 29, 2009