Marquez did nothing the first 4 rounds, how on earth a real boxing fan could give him 1-4 ( any of them) is laughable.
Everyone is giving Marquez the early rounds with the exception of Round 1, and in some cases Round 3. Your cards a joke.
I said my card was exactly the same as Lederman's, round by round, so use that card as a reference. I make it a point to only judge fights live and round by round since judges can't watch replays and change their mind, and my card ended up with Pac winning 8 rounds to 4, even though the reality was that the fight as a whole was closer than that. That's the kind of **** that happens when judging boxing fights.
Rd 1: 10-9 Pac Rd 2: 10-9 Marquez Rd 3: 10-9 Pac Rd 4: 10-9 Marquez Rd 5: 10-9 Marquez Rd 6: 10-9 Marquez Rd 7: 10-9 Marquez Rd 8: 10-9 Pac Rd 9: 10-9 Marquez Rd 10: 10-9 Pac Rd 11: 10-9 Pac Rd 12: 10-9 Pac I hate Nacho for telling JMM he was winning....
First person to score that round correctly. Congrats. Basic difference in our scorecard is I had Marquez winning round 3, and losing round 6. Round 1 was close, maybe I should have gave it to Pac but I felt Marquez did good body-work.
I agree it was close by rounds and that's what counts and I don't regret that we bought it because it was really good but I'm still upset. That hasn't worn off in the cold light of day.
Most boxing fans agree with my scoring not yours son. Your man was inactive for the frist 12 min of the fight and it cost him. Get over it your fighter lost.
Pac-Marq III 10-9 9-10 9-10 9-10 9-10 10-9 9-10 (I think I gave this round to Pac before seeing the replays) 9-10 10-9 9-10 10-9 9-10 112-116 for Marquez, but close to 113-115 on my card, but Marquez's rounds were much much clearer than Pacquiao's.