Manny Pacquiao vs Juan Manuel Marquez 3 - Judge Robert Hoyle interview [VIDEO]

Hoyle's card is alright, think he gave round 2-3 to the wrong man.

 

According to those who said JMM won 10 rounds, this judge don't know **** about boxing.

 

I think it was pacs fault, buboy (i cant understand what roach is saying anyway) keeps telling pac to approach marquez from different angles, but pac wont listen...

 

If marquez wasnt playing safe and took some risk, he would have gotten all the close rounds, and easily won the fight..:deal

In close rounds like that, you have to favor the guy who took the risk and initiated...no risk no reward!!!

 

Nah, I favor the guy who lands the cleaner, more effective punches. Not the guy that wings and glances or hits air just because he took risks. :good

 

i was referring to close rounds, rounds where its difficult for judges to choose the winner of that round, and i think what i explained earlier is what the judges did. I think you know that this isnt new in boxing, and I think its fair enough...

 

One of my friends on YT sent me this lol

"no combinations at all.. just one punch after another" i agree.. and that's the reason why most fans, even pinoys think he lost the fight.. because it seemed like he underperformed.. but the numbers don't lie.. among their 3 fights, i believe this was the one where pac connected more and marquez missed most.. and marquez didn't really do anything to win the fight decisively.. it pisses me off when other people say it was a robbery when the truth is, it could have gone either way..

 

It's not fair, and it's bull**** if that's how judges score fights. I understand how some judges prefer aggression, but that could lead to awful decisions like Diaz-Malignaggi and Marquez-Pac III (118-110, 116-112).

 

Can I get a transcription of this please?