juan manuel marquez is pacquaios ken norton

finally been able to score the fight again this time with no sound because i felt the HBO's commentary was very biased in afvor of manny pacquaio.

going against the grain i scored for pacquaio 115-114 or 6-5-1 in rounds , the first time i watched it on a stream i had it 114-114 or 6-6

now to support why i though pacquaio sneaked the fight i refer to the stats that had pacquaio out-landing marquez 10-1-1 in rounds , pacquiao also threw more punches 12-0 in rounds so its east to see why the judges scored the fight for manny pacquaio.

here is a wee table of stats that i think supports the above....

This content is protected

This content is protected

there is no doubting this was a very very close fight , i found it one of the hardest fights i have ever scored , it basically ties up with the previous 2 fight which i scored.....

pacquaio 115-111 marquez or 6-5-1 in rounds but manny had 3 knockdowns
pacquaio 114-114 draw or 6-5-1 in rounds to marquez but manny had 1 knockdown

i dont think this fight was a robbery in any way because of how tight the rounds were , what i dont agree with is the 116-112 card for pacquaio by 1 judge and by HBO's harold lederman no way in hell was there 4 rounds to either boxer in that fight.

 

Stopped reading after this part.

 

Yeah, what Scott said.

 

usually if a fighter throws more punches and lands more than his opponent then he will be given the round by most judges and people scoring the fight.

im only saying how i saw it.

quality of punches does come into no doubt and that why marquez won so many rounds as he was being out-landed by manny.

it was a close fight , HBO were so full of manny i think it turned alot of people off them , but ive also heard primetime were up marquez's ass so that why i watched the fight again with no sound.

 

I'm gonna read this thread again with no picture.

 

i had degale by 2 rounds if i can remember.....mate the punchstats CAN be mis-leading there is no dount about it.

im just saying that the judges saw manny throw and land more than marquez , push him back although i think he wasnt effective enough doing it.

thats why i think they scored the fight to manny.

it was a very hard fight to score , there would be no argument from me if they had marquez the winner , the fight was that close

 

mate if thats the reason then its a disgrace , its also saying that those judges are corrupt which i dont think they are.

on the general forum they are saying mayweather is fighting in february..its an audio on a radio station , if thats the truth then i cant see the manny vs floyd fight till this time next year as manny will prob fight april time or something

 

all 3 fights were close although the first one with the knockdowns made it very hard for marquez to win the fight , he would have needed to do a hopkins vs pascal and win every round after the knockdowns..which he never did although he gave it some try