Marquez-Pacquiao Compubox Stats: Important or Not?

I just hope all the people saying this will never use compubox stats from now on...


Highly doubt it...

Compubox dont mean ****...unless it fits your agenda...

 

:rofl nice.

 

excuses excuses

YOu guys should start a Petition to take Compubox off boxing!

LOL

 

why it dont mean **** anyway lol just shows that the 1 using it as back up knows f**kall about scoring a fight

 

I meant it in the way that it's merely a tool that can be used to gauge how a fight might be scored, much like the Lederman card. Although, the fact that it gives "statistics," means it's by nature misleading due to the fact that it's presented as a definitive fact, rather than a subjective card.

Basically, it ought to be treated the same as the Lederman card. Usually in the ballpark, can be way off, can occasionally be dead on, but still a representation of what a judge could have seen.

 

so in their second fight when all yall were using compubox and saying **** drinker had the better numbers in was coo then, but now when "your" same excuse in fight 2 is being brought up now in fight 3, "compubox aint ****"....eat a dick freddy...u whack pos...u come up with somethin better then instead of bein a mod for a fcukin website

 

then people should watch the tito/oscar fight again especially the first 7 without the compubox cause it's very clear oscar threw a lot of punches that was either landing on the gloves

 

Of course Compubox is fallible.
Showing 1rd out of tens of thousands dont mean ****.

No system is perfect.

But at the end of the day that system and judges all showed that PAC just won the fight.

Believe it or not....

End thread.

 

Good video, though I thought Paulie won 7-5. Marquez actually won far clearer than Paulie did in this 3rd fight imho, though.

 

ive never quoted compubox and never will

 

ok not u, but many other haters

i remember that someone's go to argument for **** drinker winning fight 2 was to post a picture of the compubox numbers, and now when folks do that SAME thing, its "compubox don't now **** bout boxing"

atsch

 

That argument works both ways though. As you said, JMM's compubox stats were better for fight 2, and 1 as well, I believe, but people still said it didn't matter, Pacquiao did more and still won, and he indeed was given the win in the 2nd fight. And now the same hypocrites are using compubox to say he beat JMM this time around. It's used to fit agenda's, and nothing else. Means nothing in the cold light of day.

 

yezzir...

 

the big difference in the previous fights were the knockdowns though

yes **** drinker had better compubox numbers but the fact that he fell on his ass is what hurt him

its a game based on points, and manny was always able to come out with the higher amount of points

fight 2 i had as a draw; however, due to that 10-8 round, manny was up by 1 point on the scorecards

in this 3rd fight, no 10-8 rounds, don’t look at who won each round more dominantly, look at who won more of the rounds. I think Manny won more rounds.